Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 2;6(4):e23579. doi: 10.2196/23579.
Companies use brand websites as a promotional tool to engage consumers on the web, which can increase product use. Given that some products are harmful to the health of consumers, it is important for marketing associated with these products to be subject to public health surveillance. However, terms of service (TOS) governing the use of brand website content may impede such important research.
The aim of this study is to explore the TOS for brand websites with public health significance to assess possible legal and ethical challenges for conducting research on consumer product websites.
Using Statista, we purposefully constructed a sample of 15 leading American tobacco, alcohol, psychiatric pharmaceutical, fast-food, and gun brands that have associated websites. We developed and implemented a structured coding system for the TOS on these websites and coded for the presence versus absence of different types of restriction that might impact the ability to conduct research.
All TOS stated that by accessing the website, users agreed to abide by the TOS (15/15, 100%). A total of 11 out of 15 (73%) websites had age restrictions in their TOS. All alcohol brand websites (5/15, 33%) required users to enter their age or date of birth before viewing website content. Both websites for tobacco brands (2/15, 13%) further required that users register and verify their age and identity to access any website content and agree that they use tobacco products. Only one website (1/15, 7%) allowed users to display, download, copy, distribute, and translate the website content as long as it was for personal and not commercial use. A total of 33% (5/15) of TOS unconditionally prohibited or put substantial restrictions on all of these activities and/or failed to specify if they were allowed or prohibited. Moreover, 87% (13/15) of TOS indicated that website access could be restricted at any time. A total of 73% (11/15) of websites specified that violating TOS could result in deleting user content from the website, revoking access by having the user's Internet Protocol address blocked, terminating log-in credentials, or enforcing legal action resulting in civil or criminal penalties.
TOS create complications for public health surveillance related to e-marketing on brand websites. Recent court opinions have reduced the risk of federal criminal charges for violating TOS on public websites, but this risk remains unclear for private websites. The public health community needs to establish standards to guide and protect researchers from the possibility of legal repercussions related to such efforts.
公司将品牌网站用作网络宣传工具,以吸引消费者,从而增加产品的使用率。鉴于某些产品会危害消费者健康,与这些产品相关的营销活动应当受到公共卫生监督。然而,管理品牌网站内容使用的服务条款(TOS)可能会对这种重要的研究造成阻碍。
本研究旨在探索具有公共卫生意义的品牌网站的 TOS,以评估在消费者产品网站上进行研究可能面临的法律和伦理挑战。
我们使用 Statista 有针对性地构建了一个由 15 家美国主要烟草、酒精、精神药物、快餐和枪支品牌组成的样本,这些品牌都有相关网站。我们为这些网站制定并实施了一个结构化的 TOS 编码系统,并对可能影响研究能力的不同类型的限制的存在与否进行编码。
所有 TOS 都规定,用户访问网站即表示同意遵守 TOS(15/15,100%)。共有 11 家(73%)网站的 TOS 中有年龄限制。所有酒精品牌网站(5/15,33%)都要求用户在查看网站内容前输入年龄或出生日期。两家烟草品牌网站(2/15,13%)进一步要求用户注册并验证年龄和身份,以访问任何网站内容,并同意他们使用烟草制品。只有一家网站(1/15,7%)允许用户展示、下载、复制、分发和翻译网站内容,只要是用于个人而非商业用途。TOS 中有 33%(5/15)无条件禁止或对所有这些活动进行实质性限制,或者未明确说明是否允许或禁止这些活动。此外,87%(13/15)的 TOS 表明网站访问可以随时受到限制。共有 73%(11/15)的网站规定,违反 TOS 可能导致从网站上删除用户内容、通过阻止用户的互联网协议地址吊销访问权限、终止登录凭证,或采取法律行动,导致民事或刑事处罚。
TOS 为与品牌网站上的电子营销相关的公共卫生监督带来了复杂性。最近的法院意见降低了因违反公共网站的 TOS 而被联邦刑事指控的风险,但私人网站的这种风险仍不清楚。公共卫生界需要制定标准,指导和保护研究人员,使其免受与这些努力相关的法律后果的影响。