Drug De-addiction and Treatment Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Madhya Marg, Sector 12 Chandigarh 160012, India.
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Virbhadra Road Shivaji Nagar, near Barrage, Sturida Colony, Rishikesh 249203, India.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2021 Aug 30;56(5):513-534. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa125.
There are potential clinical, ethical and legal concerns with overdosing benzodiazepines (or barbiturates) for the treatment of moderate to severe alcohol withdrawal symptoms (AWS) through telemedicine or ambulatory outpatients. A rapid systematic review to (a) qualitatively summarize the non-benzodiazepine treatment alternatives, (b) evaluate the quality of evidence for the same to effectively manage moderate to severe AWS.
We conducted searches on PubMed (January 1990 to 31 March 2020), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. We selected the English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and adverse effects of non-benzodiazepine and non-barbiturate medications among adults with a diagnosis of AWS. Data extraction was done in a predefined format. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment and qualitative synthesis of evidence was done with the RoB2 tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) proGDT.
Thirty-four RCTs were included. Gabapentin (n = 6), carbamazepine (n = 5), baclofen (n = 5), valproate (n = 3), clonidine/lofexidine (n = 3) and acamprosate (n = 2) had more than one trial with a particular comparison group. Four studies were found to have a low ROB. The GRADE evidence summary showed gabapentin had a 'moderate' level of evidence against standard benzodiazepine treatments for reducing the severity of AWS. The level of certainty was 'low' for carbamazepine, baclofen and valproate and 'very low' for acamprosate and clonidine/lofexidine. Reported adverse events between these alternative medications and benzodiazepines or placebo were generally unremarkable.
Although benzodiazepines remain the treatment of choice for AWS, during particular circumstances, gabapentin could be an alternative although like benzodiazepines is not without risk when used in the community. Future RCTs must aim to improve upon the quality of evidence.
通过远程医疗或门诊患者,超量使用苯二氮䓬类药物(或巴比妥类药物)治疗中重度酒精戒断症状(AWS),可能存在临床、伦理和法律方面的问题。本快速系统评价旨在:(a)定性总结非苯二氮䓬类替代治疗方法;(b)评估用于有效治疗中重度 AWS 的证据质量。
我们在 PubMed(1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月 31 日)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Google Scholar 上进行了检索。我们选择了评估 AWS 成人中使用非苯二氮䓬类和非巴比妥类药物治疗的疗效和不良反应的英语随机对照试验(RCT)。按照预先设定的格式进行数据提取。使用 RoB2 工具和推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE) proGDT 对偏倚风险(RoB)评估和证据进行定性综合。
共纳入 34 项 RCT。加巴喷丁(n=6)、卡马西平(n=5)、巴氯芬(n=5)、丙戊酸(n=3)、可乐定/可乐定(n=3)和阿坎酸(n=2)有多个试验采用特定的比较组。有 4 项研究被认为 RoB 较低。GRADE 证据总结表明,与标准苯二氮䓬类药物治疗相比,加巴喷丁在减轻 AWS 严重程度方面具有“中等”证据水平。卡马西平、巴氯芬和丙戊酸的确定性水平为“低”,阿坎酸和可乐定/可乐定的确定性水平为“非常低”。这些替代药物与苯二氮䓬类药物或安慰剂之间报告的不良反应通常无显著差异。
尽管苯二氮䓬类药物仍然是 AWS 的治疗选择,但在某些情况下,加巴喷丁可能是一种替代药物,尽管与苯二氮䓬类药物一样,在社区中使用时并非没有风险。未来的 RCT 必须致力于提高证据质量。