Zhao Jinxing, Xu Fangchang
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd., Shanghai 200093, China.
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 19;20(1):75. doi: 10.3390/e20010075.
Finite-time thermodynamic models for an Otto cycle, an Atkinson cycle, an over-expansion Miller cycle (M1), an LIVC Miller cycle through late intake valve closure (M2) and an LIVC Miller cycle with constant compression ratio (M3) have been established. The models for the two LIVC Miller cycles are first developed; and the heat-transfer and friction losses are considered with the effects of real engine parameters. A comparative analysis for the energy losses and performances has been conducted. The optimum compression-ratio ranges for the efficiency and effective power are different. The comparative results of cycle performances are influenced together by the ratios of the energy losses and the cycle types. The Atkinson cycle has the maximum peak power and efficiency, but the minimum power density; and the M1 cycle can achieve the optimum comprehensive performances. The less net fuel amount and the high peak cylinder pressure (M3 cycle) have a significantly adverse effect on the loss ratios of the heat-transfer and friction of the M2 and M3 cycles; and the effective power and energy efficiency are always lower than the M1 and Atkinson cycles. When greatly reducing the weights of the heat-transfer and friction, the M3 cycle has significant advantage in the energy efficiency. The results obtained can provide guidance for selecting the cycle type and optimizing the performances of a real engine.
已经建立了用于奥托循环、阿特金森循环、过膨胀米勒循环(M1)、通过延迟进气门关闭的低惯性可变压缩比米勒循环(M2)以及具有恒定压缩比的低惯性可变压缩比米勒循环(M3)的有限时间热力学模型。首次开发了两种低惯性可变压缩比米勒循环的模型;并考虑了传热和摩擦损失以及实际发动机参数的影响。对能量损失和性能进行了对比分析。效率和有效功率的最佳压缩比范围不同。循环性能的对比结果受能量损失比和循环类型的共同影响。阿特金森循环具有最大的峰值功率和效率,但功率密度最小;而M1循环可以实现最佳的综合性能。较少的净燃料量和较高的气缸峰值压力(M3循环)对M2和M3循环的传热和摩擦损失率有显著不利影响;并且有效功率和能量效率始终低于M1和阿特金森循环。当大幅降低传热和摩擦的权重时,M3循环在能量效率方面具有显著优势。所得结果可为实际发动机的循环类型选择和性能优化提供指导。