Suppr超能文献

建筑制冷中太阳能吸收式和吸收压缩式混合制冷的热经济学评估

Exergoeconomic Assessment of Solar Absorption and Absorption-Compression Hybrid Refrigeration in Building Cooling.

作者信息

Jing Yue, Li Zeyu, Liu Liming, Lu Shengzi

机构信息

School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of High Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2018 Feb 17;20(2):130. doi: 10.3390/e20020130.

Abstract

The paper mainly deals with the match of solar refrigeration, i.e., solar/natural gas-driven absorption chiller (SNGDAC), solar vapor compression-absorption integrated refrigeration system with parallel configuration (SVCAIRSPC), and solar absorption-subcooled compression hybrid cooling system (SASCHCS), and building cooling based on the exergoeconomics. Three types of building cooling are considered: Type 1 is the single-story building, type 2 includes the two-story and three-story buildings, and type 3 is the multi-story buildings. Besides this, two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Turpan, are taken into account as well. The product cost flow rate is employed as the primary decision variable. The result exhibits that SNGDAC is considered as a suitable solution for type 1 buildings in Turpan, owing to its negligible natural gas consumption and lowest product cost flow rate. SVCAIRSPC is more applicable for type 2 buildings in Turpan because of its higher actual cooling capacity of absorption subsystem and lower fuel and product cost flow rate. Additionally, SASCHCS shows the most extensive cost-effectiveness, namely, its exergy destruction and product cost flow rate are both the lowest when used in all types of buildings in Guangzhou or type 3 buildings in Turpan. This paper is helpful to promote the application of solar cooling.

摘要

本文主要研究太阳能制冷的匹配,即太阳能/天然气驱动吸收式制冷机(SNGDAC)、并联配置的太阳能蒸汽压缩-吸收一体化制冷系统(SVCAIRSPC)和太阳能吸收-过冷压缩混合制冷系统(SASCHCS),以及基于经济学的建筑制冷。考虑了三种类型的建筑制冷:类型1是单层建筑,类型2包括两层和三层建筑,类型3是多层建筑。除此之外,还考虑了中国的两个城市广州和吐鲁番。将产品成本流率作为主要决策变量。结果表明,SNGDAC被认为是吐鲁番类型1建筑的合适解决方案,因为其天然气消耗量可忽略不计且产品成本流率最低。SVCAIRSPC更适用于吐鲁番的类型2建筑,因为其吸收子系统的实际制冷量较高且燃料和产品成本流率较低。此外,SASCHCS显示出最广泛的成本效益,即在广州的所有类型建筑或吐鲁番的类型3建筑中使用时,其损失和产品成本流率均最低。本文有助于推动太阳能制冷的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee4/7512623/5f4440822cde/entropy-20-00130-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验