• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫星激光测距在获取澳大利亚 ILRS 站的 Love 和 Shida 数局部值中的应用。

Satellite Laser Ranging for Retrieval of the Local Values of the Love and Shida Numbers for the Australian ILRS Stations.

机构信息

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Environmental and Geodetic Sciences, Koszalin University of Technology, Śniadeckich 2, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland.

Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18A, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 30;20(23):6851. doi: 10.3390/s20236851.

DOI:10.3390/s20236851
PMID:33266091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7730351/
Abstract

This paper deals with the analysis of local Love and Shida numbers (parameters and ) values of the Australian Yarragadee and Mount Stromlo satellite laser ranging (SLR) stations. The research was conducted based on data from the Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellites, LAGEOS-1 and LAGEOS-2, and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, STELLA and STARLETTE. Data from a 60-month time interval, from 01.01.2014 to 01.01.2019, was used. In the first research stage, the Love and Shida numbers values were determined separately from observations of each satellite; the obtained values of , exhibit a high degree of compliance, and the differences do not exceed formal error values. At this stage, we found that it was not possible to determine from the data of STELLA and STARLETTE. In the second research stage, we combined the satellite observations of MEO (LAGEOS-1+LAGEOS-2) and LEO (STELLA+STARLETTE) and redefined the , parameters. The final values were adopted, and further analyses were made based on the values obtained from the combined observations. For the Yarragadee station, local = 0.5756 ± 0.0005 and = 0.0751 ± 0.0002 values were obtained from LAGEOS-1 + LAGEOS-2 and = 0.5742 ± 0.0015 were obtained from STELLA+STARLETTE data. For the Mount Stromlo station, we obtained the local = 0.5601 ± 0.0006 and = 0.0637 ± 0.0003 values from LAGEOS-1+LAGEOS-2 and = 0.5618 ± 0.0017 from STELLA + STARLETTE. We found discrepancies between the local parameters determined for the Yarragadee and Mount Stromlo stations and the commonly used values of the , parameters averaged for the whole Earth (so-called global nominal parameters). The sequential equalization method was used for the analysis, which allowed to determine the minimum time interval necessary to obtain stable , values. It turned out to be about 50 months. Additionally, we investigated the impact of the use of local values of the Love/Shida numbers on the determination of the Yarragadee and Mount Stromlo station coordinates. We proposed to determine the stations (, , ) coordinates in International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2014 (ITRF2014) in two computational versions: using global nominal , values and local , values calculated during this research. We found that the use of the local values of the , parameters in the process of determining the stations coordinates influences the result.

摘要

本文研究了澳大利亚 Yarragadee 和 Mount Stromlo 卫星激光测距(SLR)站的本地 Love 和 Shida 数(参数 和 )值的分析。该研究基于 Medium Earth Orbit(MEO)卫星 LAGEOS-1 和 LAGEOS-2 以及 Low Earth Orbit(LEO)卫星 STELLA 和 STARLETTE 的数据进行。使用了 60 个月的时间间隔,即 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 1 日的数据。在第一研究阶段,从每个卫星的观测中分别确定了 Love 和 Shida 数的值;获得的 , 值表现出高度的一致性,差异不超过正规误差值。在这一阶段,我们发现无法从 STELLA 和 STARLETTE 的数据中确定 。在第二研究阶段,我们组合了 MEO(LAGEOS-1+LAGEOS-2)和 LEO(STELLA+STARLETTE)的卫星观测结果,并重新定义了 , 参数。采用了最终值,并根据组合观测结果进行了进一步分析。对于 Yarragadee 站,从 LAGEOS-1+LAGEOS-2 观测中得到本地 =0.5756±0.0005 和 =0.0751±0.0002 的值,从 STELLA+STARLETTE 数据中得到本地 =0.5742±0.0015 的值。对于 Mount Stromlo 站,从 LAGEOS-1+LAGEOS-2 观测中得到本地 =0.5601±0.0006 和 =0.0637±0.0003 的值,从 STELLA+STARLETTE 观测中得到本地 =0.5618±0.0017 的值。我们发现,Yarragadee 和 Mount Stromlo 站确定的本地参数与地球平均(所谓的全球标称参数)的 Love/Shida 数参数之间存在差异。我们使用了序列均衡化方法进行分析,该方法可以确定获得稳定的 Love/Shida 数参数值所需的最小时间间隔。结果表明,大约需要 50 个月。此外,我们还研究了 Love/Shida 数的本地值对 Yarragadee 和 Mount Stromlo 站坐标确定的影响。我们提出了在国际地面参考框架 2014(ITRF2014)中确定站(,,)坐标的两种计算版本:使用全球标称 Love/Shida 数参数值和本研究中计算得到的本地 Love/Shida 数参数值。我们发现,在确定站坐标的过程中使用本地 Love/Shida 数参数值会影响结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/7f74fbdfd662/sensors-20-06851-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/66eebf065ed6/sensors-20-06851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/6e2d5601cb34/sensors-20-06851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2fb3dc369a31/sensors-20-06851-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2d5364045044/sensors-20-06851-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/c156baf71b7f/sensors-20-06851-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2fd0807f93b3/sensors-20-06851-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/7f74fbdfd662/sensors-20-06851-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/66eebf065ed6/sensors-20-06851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/6e2d5601cb34/sensors-20-06851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2fb3dc369a31/sensors-20-06851-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2d5364045044/sensors-20-06851-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/c156baf71b7f/sensors-20-06851-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/2fd0807f93b3/sensors-20-06851-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdd3/7730351/7f74fbdfd662/sensors-20-06851-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Satellite Laser Ranging for Retrieval of the Local Values of the Love and Shida Numbers for the Australian ILRS Stations.卫星激光测距在获取澳大利亚 ILRS 站的 Love 和 Shida 数局部值中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 30;20(23):6851. doi: 10.3390/s20236851.
2
Analysis of the Quality of SLR Station Coordinates Determined from Laser Ranging to the LARES Satellite.激光测距至 LARES 卫星得到的 SLR 站坐标质量分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;21(3):737. doi: 10.3390/s21030737.
3
Analysis of the Results of the Borowiec SLR Station (7811) for the Period 1993-2019 as an Example of the Quality Assessment of Satellite Laser Ranging Stations.以Borowiec SLR站(7811)1993 - 2019年期间的结果分析为例进行卫星激光测距站质量评估
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;22(2):616. doi: 10.3390/s22020616.
4
Differencing strategies for SLR observations at the Wettzell observatory.韦茨勒天文台单基线射电干涉测量观测的差分策略。
J Geod. 2022;96(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00190-021-01588-4. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
5
French transportable laser ranging station: scientific objectives, technical features, and performance.法国便携式激光测距站:科学目标、技术特点及性能
Appl Opt. 2000 Jan 20;39(3):402-10. doi: 10.1364/ao.39.000402.
6
Tidal Love and Shida numbers estimated by geodetic VLBI.通过大地测量甚长基线干涉测量法估算的潮汐洛夫数和施达数。
J Geodyn. 2013 Oct;70:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.05.001.
7
An Analysis of the Eurasian Tectonic Plate Motion Parameters Based on GNSS Stations Positions in ITRF2014.基于ITRF2014中全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)测站位置的欧亚板块运动参数分析
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 25;20(21):6065. doi: 10.3390/s20216065.
8
Orbit Determination of Korean GEO Satellite Using Single SLR Sensor.利用单台 SLR 传感器进行韩国地球静止轨道卫星的轨道确定。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 29;18(9):2847. doi: 10.3390/s18092847.
9
Reply to "A comment on "A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al."".对《关于“I. 丘福里尼等人利用LARES和LAGEOS卫星以及GRACE地球重力模型对广义相对论的一项检验”的评论》的回复。
Eur Phys J C Part Fields. 2018;78(11):880. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Undifferenced Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination of Swarm and GRACE-FO Satellites from GNSS Observations.利用全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)观测进行群卫星和GRACE-FO卫星的无差分运动学精密轨道确定
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;22(3):1071. doi: 10.3390/s22031071.

引用本文的文献

1
Satellite and UAV Platforms, Remote Sensing for Geographic Information Systems.卫星和无人机平台,用于地理信息系统的遥感技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;22(12):4564. doi: 10.3390/s22124564.

本文引用的文献

1
Tidal Love and Shida numbers estimated by geodetic VLBI.通过大地测量甚长基线干涉测量法估算的潮汐洛夫数和施达数。
J Geodyn. 2013 Oct;70:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.05.001.