Jaeger Gregg
Quantum Communication and Measurement Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Division of Natural Science and Mathematics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Feb 2;21(2):141. doi: 10.3390/e21020141.
The question of whether virtual quantum particles exist is considered here in light of previous critical analysis and under the assumption that there are particles in the world as described by quantum field theory. The relationship of the classification of particles to quantum-field-theoretic calculations and the diagrammatic aids that are often used in them is clarified. It is pointed out that the distinction between virtual particles and others and, therefore, judgments regarding their reality have been made on basis of these methods rather than on their physical characteristics. As such, it has obscured the question of their existence. It is here argued that the most influential arguments against the existence of virtual particles but not other particles fail because they either are arguments against the existence of particles in general rather than virtual particles , or are dependent on the imposition of classical intuitions on quantum systems, or are simply beside the point. Several reasons are then provided for considering virtual particles real, such as their descriptive, explanatory, and predictive value, and a clearer characterization of virtuality-one in terms of intermediate states-that also applies beyond perturbation theory is provided. It is also pointed out that in the role of force mediators, they serve to preclude action-at-a-distance between interacting particles. For these reasons, it is concluded that virtual particles are as real as other quantum particles.
鉴于先前的批判性分析,并假设世界上存在量子场论所描述的粒子,本文探讨了虚拟量子粒子是否存在的问题。阐明了粒子分类与量子场论计算以及其中常用的图解辅助工具之间的关系。指出虚拟粒子与其他粒子的区别,以及因此对它们真实性的判断,是基于这些方法而非它们的物理特性做出的。因此,这模糊了它们是否存在的问题。本文认为,最有影响力的反对虚拟粒子而非其他粒子存在的论据是站不住脚的,因为它们要么是反对一般粒子存在的论据,而非针对虚拟粒子,要么依赖于将经典直觉强加于量子系统,要么根本不着边际。接着给出了几个认为虚拟粒子真实存在的理由,比如它们的描述、解释和预测价值,并提供了一个更清晰的虚拟性特征——基于中间态——这也适用于微扰理论之外的情况。还指出,在作为力的媒介的角色中,它们有助于排除相互作用粒子之间的超距作用。基于这些原因,得出结论:虚拟粒子与其他量子粒子一样真实。