• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中的招募经验:文献综述与注释书目

Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.

作者信息

Hunninghake D B, Darby C A, Probstfield J L

出版信息

Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):6S-30S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90004-3.

DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(87)90004-3
PMID:3326716
Abstract

A literature review was conducted to determine what problems exist in accruing adequate numbers of patients for clinical trials. Accrual rates are often not clearly reported, and most studies report that the time period for accrual was extended. Delays in recruitment have an impact on costs and workload throughout the trial. Other problems with the recruitment outcomes include miscalculations in the number of eligible participants in the total population, variations in yield from different types of recruitment sources, and level of community awareness. Planning for recruitment should be part of the overall trial design. Ideally, recruitment planning should be conducted in harmony between the national and local levels. Local community members should be involved. Data-based management of recruitment is necessary and should include a comprehensive data monitoring system with strong administrative support at both central and local levels. Recruitment goals and provisions for corrective action if recruitment lags should be included. Socioeconomic characteristics and attitudes of patients and physicians should be considered in recruitment efforts because they can affect patient participation during all phases of the study.

摘要

进行了一项文献综述,以确定在为临床试验招募足够数量的患者方面存在哪些问题。入组率往往没有得到明确报告,而且大多数研究报告称入组时间段有所延长。招募延迟会对整个试验的成本和工作量产生影响。招募结果的其他问题包括对总人口中符合条件的参与者数量计算错误、不同类型招募来源的产出差异以及社区认知水平。招募规划应成为总体试验设计的一部分。理想情况下,招募规划应在国家和地方层面协调进行。当地社区成员应参与其中。基于数据的招募管理是必要的,应包括一个全面的数据监测系统,并在中央和地方层面都有强有力的行政支持。应纳入招募目标以及如果招募滞后时的纠正措施规定。在招募工作中应考虑患者和医生的社会经济特征及态度,因为它们会影响研究各个阶段的患者参与情况。

相似文献

1
Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.临床试验中的招募经验:文献综述与注释书目
Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4 Suppl):6S-30S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90004-3.
2
Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography.对照临床试验的招募:文献综述与注释书目
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Aug;18(4):328-52. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00236-x.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
4
Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study.初级保健研究中参与者招募的预测:一项定性研究。
Trials. 2015 Oct 20;16:473. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1002-9.
5
6
Provider roles in the recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials.医疗服务提供者在招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验中的角色。
Cancer. 2007 Feb 1;109(3):465-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22436.
7
Improving clinical trial accrual through a novel feedback approach: Lessons learned from a single disease site group.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr;5(2):70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
8
Who's Eligible Anyway? Risk Modeling for Clinical Trial Accrual.谁有资格呢?临床试验入组的风险建模。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5397-5399. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1710. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
9
Performance and predictors of recruitment success in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's cardiovascular clinical trials.国家心肺血液研究所心血管临床试验中招募成功的表现和预测因素。
Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):444-451. doi: 10.1177/1740774518792271. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
10
Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.将随机试验结果应用于临床实践:随机分组前失访的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 10;289(6454):1281-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1281.

引用本文的文献

1
Research assistants' experiences recruiting patients with psychosis into clinical trials: a qualitative study.研究助理招募精神病患者参与临床试验的经历:一项定性研究。
Trials. 2025 May 30;26(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08882-y.
2
Provider Interaction With an Electronic Health Record Notification to Identify Eligible Patients for a Cluster Randomized Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: Secondary Analysis.医疗机构互动与电子健康记录通知以识别初级保健中预先医疗指示的群组随机试验的合格患者:二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e41884. doi: 10.2196/41884.
3
Factors impacting participation in research during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a survey of patients in the ophthalmology outpatient department.
影响 COVID-19 大流行期间参与研究的因素:眼科门诊患者调查结果。
Trials. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06748-1.
4
Leave Me Alone With Your Symptoms! Social Exclusion at the Workplace Mediates the Relationship of Employee's Mental Illness and Sick Leave.《别管我的症状了!》员工的心理健康问题与病假之间存在关联,而工作场所的社会排斥会起到中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:892174. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892174. eCollection 2022.
5
Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.随机临床试验中的招募:MeMeMe 经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 25;17(3):e0265495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265495. eCollection 2022.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews.受试者参与临床试验的障碍与促进因素:综述概述
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 3;23:100829. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Prospective observational cohort study of factors influencing trial participation in people with motor neuron disease (FIT-participation-MND): a protocol.前瞻性观察队列研究影响肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者参与临床试验因素(FIT-participation-MND):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e044996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044996.
8
Concept and development of an interactive tool for trial recruitment planning and management.交互式试验招募规划和管理工具的概念和开发。
Trials. 2021 Mar 6;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05112-z.
9
Swedish large-scale schizophrenia study: Why do patients and healthy controls participate?瑞典大规模精神分裂症研究:患者与健康对照者为何参与?
Schizophr Res. 2021 Feb;228:360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
A cluster-randomized control trial targeting parents of pediatric cancer survivors with obesity: Rationale and study protocol of NOURISH-T.一项针对肥胖的儿科癌症幸存者父母的整群随机对照试验:NOURISH-T 的原理和研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Mar;102:106296. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106296. Epub 2021 Jan 27.