• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多柔比星/环磷酰胺(AC)与多西他赛/环磷酰胺(TC)用于原发性乳腺癌围手术期化疗时发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率的比较]

[Comparison of the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide(AC)and Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide(TC) Perioperative Chemotherapies for Primary Breast Cancer].

作者信息

Nohara Yuki, Ono Shuko, Tanaka Masumi, Yoshinaga Yasuteru, Ito Toshikazu, Yamashita Shinichi, Iwasaki Akinori

机构信息

Dept. of General Thoracic, Breast, Endocrine and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University, Faculty of Medicine.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2020 Nov;47(11):1589-1591.

PMID:33268733
Abstract

Febrile neutropenia(FN)is an adverse event associated with chemotherapy. Because well-maintained dose intensity improves survival rate, suppression of FN is important. While the incidence of FN has been recognized to be higher with docetaxel/cyclophosphamide(TC)therapy, it is generally considered lower with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide(AC)therapy, and primary prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF)is not recommended. FN with AC therapy is commonly experienced in our daily practice. Thus, we retrospectively compared the incidence of FN with AC and TC therapies. We examined the data of 48 patients with primary breast cancer, consisting of 26 patients treated with AC and 22 patients with TC as perioperative chemotherapy-from January 2014 to September 2018-to determine the incidence of FN. FN was observed in 7/26 patients who received AC(26.9%)and 5/22 patients who received TC(22.7%). Excluding patients with primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN was observed in 7/23 patients(30.4%)who received AC and 5/18 (27.8%)who received TC. The incidence of FN with AC therapy was higher than that with TC therapy in this study. Therefore, positive use of G-CSF is necessary for safety and to adequately maintain dose intensity for AC therapy.

摘要

发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是一种与化疗相关的不良事件。由于维持良好的剂量强度可提高生存率,因此抑制FN很重要。虽然已认识到多西他赛/环磷酰胺(TC)治疗的FN发生率较高,但一般认为阿霉素/环磷酰胺(AC)治疗的FN发生率较低,不建议使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行一级预防。在我们的日常实践中,AC治疗的FN很常见。因此,我们回顾性比较了AC和TC治疗中FN的发生率。我们检查了48例原发性乳腺癌患者的数据,其中26例接受AC治疗,22例接受TC作为围手术期化疗(2014年1月至2018年9月),以确定FN的发生率。在接受AC治疗的26例患者中有7例(26.9%)观察到FN,在接受TC治疗的22例患者中有5例(22.7%)观察到FN。排除接受G-CSF一级预防的患者后,在接受AC治疗的23例患者中有7例(30.4%)观察到FN,在接受TC治疗的18例患者中有5例(27.8%)观察到FN。本研究中AC治疗的FN发生率高于TC治疗。因此,为了安全起见并充分维持AC治疗的剂量强度,积极使用G-CSF是必要的。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide(AC)and Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide(TC) Perioperative Chemotherapies for Primary Breast Cancer].[多柔比星/环磷酰胺(AC)与多西他赛/环磷酰胺(TC)用于原发性乳腺癌围手术期化疗时发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率的比较]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2020 Nov;47(11):1589-1591.
2
Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.集落刺激因子对降低接受多西他赛加环磷酰胺化疗的乳腺癌患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0843-8. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
3
Febrile neutropenia and role of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer.发热性中性粒细胞减少症与预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子在多西他赛和环磷酰胺化疗乳腺癌中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3507-3512. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05868-1. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
The risk of febrile neutropenia and need for G-CSF primary prophylaxis with the docetaxel and cyclophosphamide regimen in early-stage breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.早期乳腺癌患者使用多西他赛和环磷酰胺方案发生发热性中性粒细胞减少的风险及G-CSF一级预防的必要性:一项荟萃分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct;153(3):591-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3531-z. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients: a retrospective study.预防性给予粒细胞集落刺激因子在表柔比星和环磷酰胺化疗治疗日本乳腺癌患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;84(5):1107-1114. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03948-6. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
A multi-centre study comparing granulocyte-colony stimulating factors to antibiotics for primary prophylaxis of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide induced febrile neutropenia.一项多中心研究比较了粒细胞集落刺激因子与抗生素用于多西他赛-环磷酰胺诱导的发热性中性粒细胞减少的一级预防。
Breast. 2021 Aug;58:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.生物类似药非格司亭与原研粒细胞集落刺激因子在预防乳腺癌患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的有效性比较
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;74(3):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2365-5. Epub 2017 Nov 19.
8
A retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care for early-stage breast cancer in a curative setting.回顾性评估根治性治疗早期乳腺癌的化疗剂量强度和支持性护理。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):863-72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2582-2. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
9
Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?对于乳腺癌辅助性TC化疗,使用粒细胞集落刺激因子预防发热性中性粒细胞减少在经济上是否合理?
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2805-7. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
10
Effects of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis on neutropenic toxicity and chemotherapy dose delivery in Chinese patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.原发粒细胞集落刺激因子预防对接受多西他赛加环磷酰胺辅助化疗的中国乳腺癌患者中性粒细胞毒性和化疗剂量给予的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hong Kong Med J. 2022 Dec;28(6):438-446. doi: 10.12809/hkmj219439. Epub 2022 Oct 20.