Suppr超能文献

使用多平面重建计算机断层扫描确定盂肱关节脱位中的脱轨/未脱轨病变比使用三维计算机断层扫描更容易且更具可重复性。

Determining On-/Off-track Lesions in Glenohumeral Dislocation Using Multiplanar Reconstruction Computed Tomography Is Easier and More Reproducible Than Using 3-dimensional Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Mulleneers Laura Irène C, Van Rompaey Hannah, Haloui Baïdir, Pouliart Nicole

机构信息

University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Sports Traumatology, and Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;49(1):137-145. doi: 10.1177/0363546520971856. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The glenoid track is a useful tool to predict engagement and therefore the risk of recurrence of dislocation in the presence of Hill-Sachs and/or bony Bankart lesions. To assess the glenoid track preoperatively, only methods using 3-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) have been described, but these lack a standardized, reliable, and easy description.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to evaluate a new method for determining the glenoid track using computed tomography (CT) scan with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) in comparison with using 3DR images. Our hypothesis was that the MPR method would be easier to standardize and more reproducible.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients whose arthro-CT scan revealed a Hill-Sachs lesion, whether in combination with a bony Bankart lesion or not, were included. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data from the 52 CT scans were all analyzed using open source image analysis software. Glenoid width, with or without associated bony defect, and the Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) were measured on MPR as well as on 3DR images. All measurements obtained using both methods were directly compared and evaluated for intra- and interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

In absolute values, only small differences were seen between the MPR and 3DR methods, amounting to a maximal difference of 0.07 cm for the HSI and 0.04 cm for the glenoid width. For glenoid measurements, both methods were similar. For humeral measurements, the MPR method demonstrated higher inter- and intraobserver reliability than did the 3DR method.

CONCLUSION

The newly described MPR method for the assessment of the glenoid track and HSI is at least as accurate as the published 3DR method, with better intra- and interobserver reliability. Because MPRs are also easier to obtain, this method could be recommended in daily practice.

摘要

背景

肩胛盂轨迹是预测肩关节脱位复位及因此存在Hill-Sachs和/或骨性Bankart损伤时脱位复发风险的有用工具。为了术前评估肩胛盂轨迹,仅描述了使用三维重建(3DR)的方法,但这些方法缺乏标准化、可靠且简单的描述。

目的/假设:目的是评估一种使用计算机断层扫描(CT)结合多平面重建(MPR)来确定肩胛盂轨迹的新方法,并与使用3DR图像的方法进行比较。我们的假设是MPR方法更易于标准化且重复性更好。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2级。

方法

纳入52例关节CT扫描显示有Hill-Sachs损伤的患者,无论是否合并骨性Bankart损伤。使用开源图像分析软件对52例CT扫描的医学数字成像和通信数据进行分析。在MPR图像和3DR图像上测量有无相关骨性缺损时的肩胛盂宽度以及Hill-Sachs间距(HSI)。直接比较两种方法获得的所有测量值,并评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

绝对值方面,MPR方法和3DR方法之间仅存在微小差异,HSI的最大差异为0.07 cm,肩胛盂宽度的最大差异为0.04 cm。对于肩胛盂测量,两种方法相似。对于肱骨测量,MPR方法在观察者间和观察者内的可靠性均高于3DR方法。

结论

新描述的用于评估肩胛盂轨迹和HSI的MPR方法至少与已发表的3DR方法一样准确,且观察者内和观察者间的可靠性更好。由于MPR图像也更易于获取,因此该方法可在日常实践中推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验