• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估利益相关者的社区卫生研究能力:工具改编。

Assessing community health research capacity across stakeholders: adapting a tool.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 30;36(4):1198-1208. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa105.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaa105
PMID:33270872
Abstract

Multi-sectoral collaborative approaches with strong community engagement are essential for addressing health disparities. A valid tool for assessing organizational research and capacity for community health research stakeholders could help strengthen organizational capacity for engagement in such collaborations. This study was conducted to validate an innovative tool for assessing research activity and capacity of a spectrum of stakeholder organizations to provide support for strengthening community health research capacity in Bhutan. In-person interviews with academics (n = 10), clinicians (n = 10), government staff (n = 10), consultants (n = 2) and management of health-related civil society organizations (CSOs; n = 12 interviews/organizations, 13 individuals) were recorded and transcribed. Questions covered individual and organizational research activity and capacity, research networks and an international version of the Community Research Assessment Tool (CREAT-I). Almost all participants (84%) had participated in community health research projects. Social network analysis showed a large, interconnected cluster with a few key individuals linking across sectors. CREAT-I responses identified the highest capacity in organizational support for research among academic participants, while clinical and CSO participants reported highest capacity in practical research experiences and government participants reported highest capacity in research specific experiences. The CREAT-I tool showed strong internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91) and validity. Limited money, time and skilled staff were identified as barriers to research. The CREAT-I assesses community health research capacity of organizations, and such a tool could be useful in identifying research capacity needs, monitoring impact of research capacity-building activities and contributing to a greater capacity for multi-sectoral collaborative approaches to community health research in international settings.

摘要

多部门协作并加强社区参与对于解决健康差异至关重要。一种有效的评估社区卫生研究利益相关者组织研究和能力的工具,可以帮助加强参与此类合作的组织能力。本研究旨在验证一种评估利益相关者组织研究活动和能力的创新工具,以为不丹加强社区卫生研究能力提供支持。对学者(n=10)、临床医生(n=10)、政府工作人员(n=10)、顾问(n=2)和与卫生相关的民间社会组织(CSO;n=12 次访谈/组织,13 人)进行了面对面访谈并记录和转录。问题涵盖个人和组织的研究活动和能力、研究网络以及社区研究评估工具(CREAT-I)的国际版本。几乎所有参与者(84%)都参与了社区卫生研究项目。社会网络分析显示,有一个庞大的、相互关联的集群,少数关键人物在各个部门之间建立联系。CREAT-I 的回应表明,学术参与者在组织对研究的支持方面能力最高,而临床和 CSO 参与者在实际研究经验方面能力最高,政府参与者在研究特定经验方面能力最高。CREAT-I 工具显示出很强的内部可靠性(Cronbach's α=0.91)和有效性。研究资金有限、时间有限和熟练人员短缺被确定为研究的障碍。CREAT-I 评估组织的社区卫生研究能力,这种工具可用于确定研究能力需求、监测研究能力建设活动的影响,并有助于在国际环境中加强多部门合作方法对社区卫生研究的能力。

相似文献

1
Assessing community health research capacity across stakeholders: adapting a tool.评估利益相关者的社区卫生研究能力:工具改编。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 30;36(4):1198-1208. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa105.
2
Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method.评估社区组织的研究活动和能力:使用德尔菲法完善 CREAT 工具。
J Urban Health. 2019 Dec;96(6):912-922. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0.
3
Civil society advocacy in Nigeria: promoting democratic norms or donor demands?尼日利亚的民间社会倡导:是在促进民主规范还是遵循捐助者的要求?
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0093-z.
4
The Self-assessment for Organizational Capacity Instrument for evidence-informed health policy: preliminary reliability and validity of an instrument.证据为本的卫生政策组织能力自评工具:工具初步信度和效度。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Feb;11(1):35-45. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12018. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
5
Assessing research activity and capacity of community-based organizations: development and pilot testing of an instrument.评估社区组织的研究活动与能力:一种工具的开发与试点测试
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Winter;8(4):421-32. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0067.
6
A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea.社区主导合作减少韩国贫困社区健康不平等的利益相关者分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1757975918791517. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
How donors support civil society as government accountability advocates: a review of strategies and implications for transition of donor funding in global health.捐赠者如何支持民间社会作为政府问责倡导者:审查策略及对全球卫生领域捐赠资金过渡的影响。
Global Health. 2020 Nov 12;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00628-6.
8
SDH-NET: a South-North-South collaboration to build sustainable research capacities on social determinants of health in low- and middle-income countries.SDH-NET:一项南北南合作项目,旨在建设低收入和中等收入国家关于健康社会决定因素的可持续研究能力。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Oct 22;13:45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0048-1.
9
Capacity and readiness of civil society organisations to implement community case management of malaria in Kenya.肯尼亚民间社会组织实施疟疾社区病例管理的能力与准备情况。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Nov 26;25(Suppl 2):6. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2016.25.2.9305. eCollection 2016.
10
Key considerations for designing capacity-building interventions to support evidence-based programming in underserved communities: a qualitative exploration.支持服务不足社区循证规划的能力建设干预措施设计的关键考虑因素:定性探索。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):452-461. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz177.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Effectiveness of a Community Capacity Building Program for the Wellness of Traditional Marketplace Merchants: A Pilot Study.发展和评估社区能力建设计划对传统市场商户健康的影响:一项试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212238.