School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China.
School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China.
J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;49(2):620-652. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22483. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
On the basis of the 2013 China Migrants Dynamic Survey provided by the National Health and Family Planning Commission, we explored the impact of neighbourhood choice on the socioeconomic integration of migrants and the underlying mechanism. When problems with endogeneity were controlled, the findings showed that neighbourhood choice had a significant positive effect on the socioeconomic integration of migrants, that is, compared with migrants living in informal neighbourhoods (urban villages or outdated inner-city housing), those living in formal neighbourhoods (commercial housing, affordable housing or work unit housing neighbourhoods) displayed higher socioeconomic integration. Further research found that neighbourhood choice did not directly affect the socioeconomic integration of migrants in China, partly because migrants living in formal neighbourhoods established localized social capital (contacting local residents and government personnel, seeking help from them and increasing expenditures on local invitations and gifts) to promote better integration into the city, and they had a stronger willingness to settle down, which encouraged them to work harder, actively integrated into the mainstream society.
基于国家卫生健康委员会提供的 2013 年中国流动人口动态监测调查数据,我们探讨了邻里选择对流动人口社会经济融合的影响及其内在机制。在控制了内生性问题后,研究结果表明,邻里选择对流动人口的社会经济融合有显著的正向影响,即与居住在非正式邻里(城市村庄或老旧内城住房)的流动人口相比,居住在正式邻里(商品住房、保障性住房或工作单位住房社区)的流动人口表现出更高的社会经济融合度。进一步的研究发现,邻里选择并没有直接影响中国流动人口的社会经济融合,部分原因是居住在正式邻里的流动人口建立了本地化社会资本(与当地居民和政府人员接触、寻求他们的帮助,并增加对当地邀请和礼物的支出),以促进更好地融入城市,他们有更强的定居意愿,这鼓励他们更加努力地工作,积极融入主流社会。