Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):270-281. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12547. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
Measuring rural health care quality is challenging, and payer and government reporting requirements are frequently misaligned. The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model, a multipayer global budget demonstration for rural hospitals, initially required the proposal of an All-Payer Quality (APQ) Program in which participating payers would have held participating hospitals accountable for performance on a common set of quality measures. We sought to identify quality measures appropriate for use in APQ measurement and reporting programs for globally budgeted rural hospitals.
A method was devised to identify, assess, and select quality measures from an environmental scan of core measure sets. An initial screen identified measures that were relevant, valid, and reliable. Four reviewers then independently assessed measures that passed the initial screen on a Likert scale of 1-5 for relevance, validity, reliability, responsiveness, alignment, and feasibility, and they selected a proposed measure set guided by prespecified measure set criteria.
The 4 reviewers selected 10 quality measures from a list of 344 measures drawn from 8 core measure sets. One hundred twenty-five measures satisfied screening criteria and were assessed. The mean total score was 21.5/30 (95% CI: 17.0-26.0). Inter-rater reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient range 0.544-0.656).
A formal performance measure selection methodology can generate a set of rural-appropriate health care quality measures for a multipayer rural hospital global budget program. This methodology could be replicated to select quality measures for inclusion in rural multipayer quality measurement and reporting programs.
衡量农村医疗保健质量具有挑战性,而支付方和政府的报告要求经常不一致。宾夕法尼亚农村健康模式是一项针对农村医院的多支付方全球预算试点,最初要求提出一个全民支付质量(APQ)计划,参与支付方将要求参与医院在一组共同的质量指标上履行绩效。我们试图确定适合用于全球预算农村医院的 APQ 衡量和报告计划的质量指标。
设计了一种方法,从核心衡量标准集的环境扫描中识别、评估和选择质量指标。初步筛选确定了相关、有效和可靠的措施。然后,四名审查员独立使用 1-5 分的李克特量表对通过初始筛选的措施进行相关性、有效性、可靠性、响应性、一致性和可行性评估,并根据预先规定的衡量标准选择建议的衡量标准集。
4 名审查员从 8 个核心衡量标准集中的 344 个衡量标准中选出了 10 个质量衡量标准。125 个符合筛选标准并进行了评估。总平均分 21.5/30(95%置信区间:17.0-26.0)。组内相关系数为 0.544-0.656。
正式的绩效衡量标准选择方法可以为多支付方农村医院全球预算计划生成一组适合农村的医疗保健质量衡量标准。这种方法可以复制,以选择农村多支付方质量衡量和报告计划中包含的质量衡量标准。