Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105862. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105862. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
The reduction of cyclist injuries and fatalities is one of the important issues in traffic safety. To establish countermeasures to avoid collisions, it is necessary to understand driver's responses in such critical situations. From videos of drive recorders, the behavior of cyclists and drivers that led to car-to-cyclist collisions can be analyzed objectively. In this research, the drivers' responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions were examined using videos of drive recorders, and through using a driving simulator. First, drivers' responses to avoid collisions were compared between near-miss incidents and actual collisions using videos from drive recorders. In a statistical analysis of selected parameters of the drivers' responses, the average values of different parameters such as the time-to-collision (TTC), the deceleration at the time the cyclist was first visible to the driver, and the braking reaction time (BRT) were significantly different between near-miss incidents and collisions. Applying logistic regression to the near-miss and collision data revealed that the BRT at the time the cyclist was first visible had the largest influence on collision occurrences. The velocity-TTC, and the velocity-distance graphs at the time of braking-onset was plotted; the car deceleration of 5.2 m/s was the threshold which discriminated near-miss and collisions. Second, the responses of people to avoid collisions against cyclists were investigated in a driving simulator. Based on real-world collision videos from the drive recorders, two scenarios were reconstructed where the crossing cyclist appeared suddenly from behind view-blocking obstructions at an intersection. Scenario A has a relatively large TTC of 1.9 s, and scenario B had a small TTC of 0.5 s. The BRT was significantly smaller in the group that avoided collisions than in the group that collisions occurred in scenario A, whereas all parameters (TTC, BRT, and car deceleration) were all significantly smaller in the group that avoided collision in scenario B. The driver response parameters (TTC, BRT and car deceleration) were comparable between the drive recorder data and the driving simulator experiments. It was demonstrated that the BRT is the most important parameter toward avoiding collisions. Some drivers who accelerated the cars at the intersections had large BRT, and this led to collisions. Additionally, it was observed that swerving of cars without braking was not effective for collision avoidance.
减少自行车事故和伤亡是交通安全的重要问题之一。为了制定避免碰撞的对策,有必要了解驾驶员在这种危急情况下的反应。从行车记录仪的视频中,可以客观地分析导致汽车与自行车碰撞的自行车和驾驶员的行为。在这项研究中,通过使用行车记录仪的视频和驾驶模拟器,研究了驾驶员避免汽车与自行车垂直碰撞的反应。首先,使用行车记录仪的视频,比较了近距事故和实际碰撞中驾驶员避免碰撞的反应。在对驾驶员反应的选择参数进行统计分析时,在近距事故和碰撞中,时间到碰撞(TTC)、驾驶员首次看到自行车时的减速、制动反应时间(BRT)等不同参数的平均值存在显著差异。将逻辑回归应用于近距事故和碰撞数据表明,BRT 是影响碰撞发生的最大因素。绘制了速度-TTC 和制动起始时的速度-距离图;汽车减速 5.2m/s 是区分近距事故和碰撞的阈值。其次,在驾驶模拟器中研究了驾驶员避免与自行车碰撞的反应。基于行车记录仪的真实碰撞视频,在交叉口从视线障碍物后面突然出现的情况下,重建了两个场景。场景 A 的 TTC 相对较大,为 1.9s,场景 B 的 TTC 较小,为 0.5s。在场景 A 中避免碰撞的组中,BRT 明显小于发生碰撞的组,而在场景 B 中避免碰撞的组中,所有参数(TTC、BRT 和汽车减速)都明显小于发生碰撞的组。驾驶员反应参数(TTC、BRT 和汽车减速)在行车记录仪数据和驾驶模拟器实验中具有可比性。结果表明,BRT 是避免碰撞的最重要参数。一些在交叉口加速汽车的驾驶员 BRT 较大,这导致了碰撞。此外,观察到不制动的汽车转向避让对避免碰撞无效。