• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Willis环的解剖结构并非颈动脉内膜切除术期间交叉钳夹不耐受预后的充分预测因素。

The Anatomy of the Circle of Willis Is Not a Strong Enough Predictive Factor for the Prognosis of Cross-Clamping Intolerance during Carotid Endarterectomy.

作者信息

Myrcha Piotr, Lewczuk Andrzej, Jakuciński Maciej, Kozak Mariusz, Siemieniuk Dawid, Różański Dorota, Koziorowski Dariusz, Woźniak Witold

机构信息

Chair and Clinic of General and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, W02-091 Warsaw, Poland.

Department of General, Vascular and Oncological Surgery, Masovian Brodnowski Hospital, 03-242 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 2;9(12):3913. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123913.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9123913
PMID:33276586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7761551/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is safe and effective in reducing the risk of stroke in symptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis. Having information about cross-clamping (CC) intolerance before surgery may reduce the complication rate. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance angiography perfusion (P-MR) in determining the risk of CC intolerance during CEA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

40 patients after CEA with CC intolerance were included in Group I, and 15 with CC tolerance in Group II. All patients underwent MRA of the circle of Willis (CoW), P-MR with or without Acetazolamide; P(A)-MR in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

CoW was normal in the MRA in three cases (7.5%) in Group I, and in eight (53%) in Group II. We found P-MR abnormalities in all patients from Group I and in 40% from Group II. Using a calculated cut-off point of 0.322, the patients were classified as CC tolerant with 100% sensitivity or as CC intolerant with 95% specificity. After evaluating P-MR or MRA alone, the percentage of false negative results significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

The highest value in predicting cross-clamping intolerance is achieved by using analysis of P(A)-MR and MRA of the CoW in combination.

摘要

未标注

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)在降低有症状的严重颈动脉狭窄患者的中风风险方面是安全有效的。术前了解交叉钳夹(CC)不耐受情况可能会降低并发症发生率。本研究的目的是评估磁共振血管造影(MRA)和磁共振血管造影灌注(P-MR)在确定CEA期间CC不耐受风险方面的实用性。

材料与方法

将40例CEA术后出现CC不耐受的患者纳入第一组,15例CC耐受的患者纳入第二组。所有患者均接受了Willis环(CoW)的MRA、使用或不使用乙酰唑胺的P-MR;术后进行P(A)-MR。

结果

第一组3例(7.5%)患者的MRA中CoW正常,第二组8例(53%)患者的CoW正常。我们发现第一组所有患者以及第二组40%的患者存在P-MR异常。使用计算得出的0.322的截断点,患者被分类为CC耐受,敏感性为100%,或CC不耐受,特异性为95%。单独评估P-MR或MRA后,假阴性结果的百分比显著增加。

结论

通过联合使用P(A)-MR和CoW的MRA分析,在预测交叉钳夹不耐受方面具有最高价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/1c7c931875b2/jcm-09-03913-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/9be9a70d8baf/jcm-09-03913-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/cf9d0d742b98/jcm-09-03913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/91607c36a8c5/jcm-09-03913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/1c7c931875b2/jcm-09-03913-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/9be9a70d8baf/jcm-09-03913-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/cf9d0d742b98/jcm-09-03913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/91607c36a8c5/jcm-09-03913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d180/7761551/1c7c931875b2/jcm-09-03913-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Anatomy of the Circle of Willis Is Not a Strong Enough Predictive Factor for the Prognosis of Cross-Clamping Intolerance during Carotid Endarterectomy.Willis环的解剖结构并非颈动脉内膜切除术期间交叉钳夹不耐受预后的充分预测因素。
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 2;9(12):3913. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123913.
2
Status of the circle of Willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy.Willis 环的状态与颈动脉内膜切除术期间对颈动脉阻断的不耐受。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;45(2):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.11.012. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Impact of the Supra-Aortic Trunks and Circle of Willis Patency on the Neurological Compensation during Carotid Endarterectomy.主动脉弓上血管及 Willis 环通畅情况对颈动脉内膜切除术中神经功能代偿的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;60:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 May 7.
4
Incomplete circle of Willis is associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events during carotid eversion endarterectomy without shunting.在不进行分流的颈动脉外翻内膜切除术中, Willis 环不完整与神经事件的较高发生率相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1764-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.429. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Incompleteness of the circle of Willis is related to EEG-based shunting during carotid endarterectomy.Willis 环不完整与颈动脉内膜切除术期间基于脑电图的分流有关。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;46(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
Preoperative brain temperature imaging on proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts hemispheric ischemia during carotid endarterectomy for unilateral carotid stenosis with inadequate collateral blood flow.质子磁共振波谱术前脑温度成像可预测单侧颈动脉狭窄且侧支血流不足的患者在颈动脉内膜切除术中的半球缺血情况。
Neurol Res. 2018 Aug;40(8):617-623. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1457130. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Radiographic absence of the posterior communicating arteries and the prediction of cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy.后交通动脉的影像学缺如与颈动脉内膜剥脱术后认知功能障碍的预测
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):593-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131736. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.应用选择性磁共振血管造影术评估颈内动脉狭窄时 Willis 环侧支循环血流的无创性评估。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May-Jun;23(5):1019-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
9
[Carotid surgery under loco-regional anesthesia. Early results of 100 recent cases].[局部区域麻醉下的颈动脉手术。近期100例病例的早期结果]
Ann Chir. 1999;53(6):487-93.
10
Pencil Beam Presaturation Magnetic Resonance Imaging Helps to Identify Patients at Risk for Intolerance to Temporary Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion During Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting.铅笔束预饱和磁共振成像有助于识别颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术中对临时颈内动脉闭塞不耐受的患者。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e899-e907. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.033. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Gupta Perioperative Risk for Myocardial Infarct or Cardiac Arrest (MICA) Calculator as an Intraoperative Neurologic Deficit Predictor in Carotid Endarterectomy.古普塔围手术期心肌梗死或心脏骤停(MICA)风险计算器作为颈动脉内膜切除术术中神经功能缺损的预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 28;11(21):6367. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216367.
2
Volumetric Flow Assessment in Extracranial Arteries in Patients with 70-99% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.颈内动脉狭窄70%-99%患者颅外动脉的容积血流评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;12(9):2216. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092216.
3
Intracranial Flow Volume Estimation in Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Incomplete circle of Willis is associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events during carotid eversion endarterectomy without shunting.在不进行分流的颈动脉外翻内膜切除术中, Willis 环不完整与神经事件的较高发生率相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1764-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.429. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Outcomes after early and delayed carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术的早期和延迟治疗结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1110-1119.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).
颈内动脉闭塞患者的颅内血流容积估计
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;12(3):766. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030766.
编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
4
Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.使用脑电图和体感诱发电位预测颈动脉内膜切除术期间夹闭引起的术中监测变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.064. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
5
Collateral circulation via the circle of Willis in patients with carotid artery steno-occlusive disease: evaluation on 3-T 4D MRA using arterial spin labelling.颈动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病患者通过 Willis 环的侧支循环:使用动脉自旋标记的 3-T 4D MRA 评估
Clin Radiol. 2015 Sep;70(9):960-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
6
Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting).颈动脉内膜切除术的常规或选择性颈动脉分流术(以及选择性分流术中的不同监测方法)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 23;2014(6):CD000190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000190.pub3.
7
Risk index for predicting shunt in carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术分流预测风险指数
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion: is shunting necessary?对侧颈动脉闭塞时的颈动脉内膜切除术:是否需要分流?
Int J Angiol. 2012 Sep;21(3):135-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324734.
9
Near-infrared spectroscopy to indicate selective shunt use during carotid endarterectomy.近红外光谱技术指示颈动脉内膜切除术时选择性分流的应用。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
10
Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly: risk factors, intraoperative carotid hemodynamics and short-term complications: a UK tertiary center retrospective analysis.老年患者的颈动脉内膜切除术:危险因素、术中颈动脉血流动力学及短期并发症:一项英国三级中心的回顾性分析
Vascular. 2013 Oct;21(5):273-7. doi: 10.1177/1708538113478740. Epub 2013 May 7.