Kretz Benjamin, Abello Nicolas, Bouchot Olivier, Kazandjian Caroline, Beaumont Myriam, Terriat Béatrice, Bernard Alain, Brenot Roger, Steinmetz Eric
Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Pasteur, Colmar.
Direction de la Recherche Clinique, CHU Le Bocage, Dijon.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
To prevent ischemia during carotid endarterectomy, a routine or selective shunt can be set up in cases of insufficient cerebral perfusion during the carotid clamping. The aim of this study was to analyze predictive factors for shunting under locoregional anesthesia and to validate a risk index to predict shunt.
Using a prospective database, we studied carotid endarterectomy performed under locoregional anesthesia between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2010 (n=1,223). A shunt was used because of clinical intolerance of clamping in 88 cases (group S, 7.2%). Clinical, comorbidities, demographics, and duplex scan data were used to compare group S to a control group (group C, n=1,135, 92.8%). A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of shunt. Coefficients were assigned to each predictor to propose a predictive score.
Patients in group S were significantly older than those in group C (75.6±7.8 years vs. 72.6±9.4 years, P<0.001). Other factors associated with a carotid shunt were female sex (odds ratio [OR]=2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-3.78, P<0.001), systemic arterial hypertension (OR=2.478, 95% CI: 1.16-4.46, P=0.016), occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery (OR=6.03, 95% CI: 2.91-12.48, P<0.001), and 1 factor against the likelihood of a carotid shunt, a history of contralateral carotid surgery (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.12-0.93, P=0.037). The mean flow in the contralateral common carotid artery was 696.5±298.0 mL/sec in group S and 814.7±285.5 mL/sec in group C (P<0.001). Using those 6 items, we propose a prognostic score validated in our series and allowing to divided risk of intolerance of clamping into low-risk (≤6%), intermediate-risk (6.1%-15%), and high-risk (>15%) groups.
We have established the first version of a score that predicts the need for a shunt by studying factors associated with intolerance to clamping. The relevance of this score, validated in our series, must be confirmed and adjusted by studies based on a larger sample size.
为预防颈动脉内膜切除术期间的缺血,在颈动脉夹闭期间脑灌注不足的情况下可常规或选择性地使用分流管。本研究的目的是分析局部麻醉下分流的预测因素,并验证一个预测分流的风险指数。
利用前瞻性数据库,我们研究了2003年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间在局部麻醉下进行的颈动脉内膜切除术(n = 1223)。因夹闭时临床不耐受而使用分流管的有88例(S组,7.2%)。使用临床、合并症、人口统计学和双功超声扫描数据将S组与对照组(C组,n = 1135,92.8%)进行比较。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定分流的预测因素。为每个预测因素分配系数以提出一个预测分数。
S组患者明显比C组患者年龄大(75.6±7.8岁对72.6±9.4岁,P<0.001)。与颈动脉分流相关的其他因素包括女性(比值比[OR]=2.41,95%置信区间[CI]:1.54 - 3.78,P<0.001)、全身性动脉高血压(OR = 2.478,95% CI:1.16 - 4.46,P = 0.016)、对侧颈动脉闭塞(OR = 6.03,95% CI:2.91 - 12.48,P<0.001),以及一个与颈动脉分流可能性相反的因素,即对侧颈动脉手术史(OR = 0.34,95% CI:0.12 - 0.93,P = 0.037)。S组对侧颈总动脉的平均血流为696.5±298.0 mL/秒,C组为814.7±285.5 mL/秒(P<0.001)。利用这6项指标,我们提出了一个在我们的系列研究中得到验证的预后分数,可将夹闭不耐受风险分为低风险(≤6%)、中度风险(6.1% - 15%)和高风险(>15%)组。
通过研究与夹闭不耐受相关的因素,我们建立了第一个预测分流需求的分数版本。在我们的系列研究中得到验证的这个分数的相关性,必须通过基于更大样本量的研究来确认和调整。