Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌:治疗反应评估、反应标准以及结果报告标准化的必要性。

Prostate cancer: evaluation of response to treatment, response criteria, and the need for standardization of the reporting of results.

作者信息

Aabo K

机构信息

Department of Oncology II, Finsen Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 Feb;23(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(87)90019-8.

Abstract

Response criteria and the reporting of results in clinical trials on drug therapy of stage D prostate cancer were evaluated by examination of studies listed in the Index Medicus 1980-1984. During this 5-year period, 70 studies (51 phase II and 16 phase III) were listed, comprising 3184 evaluable patients. Among 346 patients reported as having evaluable disease according to the WHO criteria, 198 had well-defined evaluable disease. A variety of response criteria were used, the NPCP criteria being the most frequent. Only three studies included solely patients with evaluable disease according to the WHO criteria. Reporting of results was often inadequate. The value of the most frequently used response parameters such as acid phosphatase, bone scan, per-rectal ultrasound, CT scan, bone pain and performance status is discussed. A system to standardise the reporting of results is proposed.

摘要

通过查阅《医学索引》1980 - 1984年列出的研究,对D期前列腺癌药物治疗临床试验的疗效标准及结果报告进行了评估。在这5年期间,共列出70项研究(51项II期和16项III期),涉及3184例可评估患者。在根据世界卫生组织标准报告为患有可评估疾病的346例患者中,198例具有明确的可评估疾病。使用了多种疗效标准,其中NPCP标准最为常用。仅有三项研究仅纳入了根据世界卫生组织标准患有可评估疾病的患者。结果报告往往不充分。讨论了最常用的反应参数如酸性磷酸酶、骨扫描、直肠超声、CT扫描、骨痛和体能状态的价值。提出了一个标准化结果报告的系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验