Citrin D L, Elson P, DeWys W D
Cancer. 1984 Jul 1;54(1):13-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840701)54:1<13::aid-cncr2820540104>3.0.co;2-f.
Evaluation of response to systemic therapy in metastatic prostate cancer is often difficult because of the infrequency of nonbony indicator lesions. The authors previously described a set of response criteria for Phase II and III studies which can be applied in patients with only bony disease. They have retrospectively evaluated response to Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and (5-fluorouracil) 5-FU in 38 patients with measurable soft tissue and visceral disease, using their response criteria for acid phosphatase and clinical status and standard definitions of response. No correlation was attempted for bone disease. Agreement between the results obtained with each system was good. Using this system of evaluating response, patients with metastatic prostate cancer with bone-dominant disease are eligible for Phase II and III studies.
由于非骨指标性病变不常见,评估转移性前列腺癌对全身治疗的反应往往很困难。作者先前描述了一套适用于II期和III期研究的反应标准,可应用于仅有骨转移疾病的患者。他们回顾性评估了38例有可测量软组织和内脏疾病的患者对阿霉素(多柔比星)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的反应,使用他们针对酸性磷酸酶和临床状态的反应标准以及标准的反应定义。未尝试对骨转移疾病进行相关性分析。每个系统所获结果之间的一致性良好。使用这种评估反应的系统,以骨转移为主的转移性前列腺癌患者有资格参加II期和III期研究。