Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Australas J Dermatol. 2021 May;62(2):168-176. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13518. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In melanoma management, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to stage patients and to indicate prognosis. More recently, it has been used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to report knowledge of and attitudes towards SLNB for patients with melanoma among Australian dermatologists.
Mixed methods study using cross-sectional questionnaires (n = 88) and semi-structured interviews (n = 13), May-September 2019.
Of the dermatologists surveyed, 56% thought SLNB had an important role in melanoma management, 26% were unsure and 18% thought SLNB unimportant. Of the 92% who would discuss SLNB with their patients, the main stated value of SLNB was for assessing eligibility for adjuvant therapies (79%); only 60% indicated SLNB was of value for providing prognostic information, and just over half (53%) thought it could improve staging. Interview data indicated that attitudes towards SLNB are shifting among dermatologists, driven by data from landmark clinical trials and the influence of professional networks. Accordingly, interviewees adopted one of three positions in relation to SLNB: (a) believed in utility of SLNB and adhered to the guidelines; (b) were unconvinced about utility of SLNB but adhered to the guidelines; and (c) were unconvinced about utility of SLNB and did not adhere to the guidelines.
Although most of the dermatologists surveyed were familiar with and follow the SLNB recommendations, some disagreement with and distrust of the recommendations was evident. Greater acceptance of the SLNB recommendations appeared to be driven by the improved outcomes demonstrated in stage III patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy.
背景/目的:在黑色素瘤管理中,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)用于分期患者并指示预后。最近,它已被用于选择接受辅助治疗的患者。本研究旨在报告澳大利亚皮肤科医生对黑色素瘤患者 SLNB 的了解和态度。
2019 年 5 月至 9 月采用横断面问卷调查(n=88)和半结构访谈(n=13)的混合方法研究。
在接受调查的皮肤科医生中,56%的人认为 SLNB 在黑色素瘤管理中具有重要作用,26%的人不确定,18%的人认为 SLNB 不重要。在 92%的表示会与患者讨论 SLNB 的皮肤科医生中,SLNB 的主要价值在于评估辅助治疗的资格(79%);只有 60%表示 SLNB 对提供预后信息有价值,超过一半(53%)的人认为它可以改善分期。访谈数据表明,由于来自标志性临床试验的数据和专业网络的影响,皮肤科医生对 SLNB 的态度正在发生变化。因此,受访者在 SLNB 相关问题上采取了以下三种立场之一:(a)相信 SLNB 的效用并遵守指南;(b)对 SLNB 的效用持怀疑态度但遵守指南;(c)对 SLNB 的效用持怀疑态度且不遵守指南。
尽管大多数接受调查的皮肤科医生熟悉并遵循 SLNB 建议,但对建议的不一致和不信任是显而易见的。对 SLNB 建议的更大接受度似乎是由接受辅助全身治疗的 III 期患者的改善结果驱动的。