• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基因表达和机器学习的生物信息学分析鉴定脓毒症诊断特征。

Identification of the Diagnostic Signature of Sepsis Based on Bioinformatic Analysis of Gene Expression and Machine Learning.

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050051,China.

出版信息

Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2022;25(1):21-28. doi: 10.2174/1386207323666201204130031.

DOI:10.2174/1386207323666201204130031
PMID:33280594
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening disease caused by the dysregulated host response to the infection and the major cause of death of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVE

Early diagnosis of sepsis could significantly reduce in-hospital mortality. Though generated from infection, the development of sepsis follows its own psychological process and disciplines, alters with gender, health status and other factors. Hence, the analysis of mass data by bioinformatics tools and machine learning is a promising method for exploring early diagnosis.

METHODS

We collected miRNA and mRNA expression data of sepsis blood samples from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and ArrayExpress databases, screened out differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by R software, predicted miRNA targets on TargetScanHuman and miRTarBase websites, conducted Gene Ontology (GO) term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis based on overlapping DEGs. The STRING database and Cytoscape were used to build protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and predict hub genes. Then we constructed a Random Forest model by using the hub genes to assess sample type.

RESULTS

Bioinformatic analysis of GEO dataset revealed 46 overlapping DEGs in sepsis. The PPI network analysis identified five hub genes, SOCS3, KBTBD6, FBXL5, FEM1C and WSB1. Random Forest model based on these five hub genes was used to assess GSE95233 and GSE95233 datasets, and the area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was 0.900 and 0.7988, respectively, which confirmed the efficacy of this model.

CONCLUSION

The integrated analysis of gene expression in sepsis and the effective Random Forest model built in this study may provide promising diagnostic methods for sepsis.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,由宿主对感染的失调反应引起,是重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡的主要原因。

目的

早期诊断脓毒症可显著降低住院死亡率。尽管脓毒症是由感染引起的,但它的发展遵循其自身的心理过程和学科,因性别、健康状况和其他因素而改变。因此,通过生物信息学工具和机器学习对大量数据进行分析是探索早期诊断的一种很有前途的方法。

方法

我们从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)和 ArrayExpress 数据库中收集了脓毒症血液样本的 miRNA 和 mRNA 表达数据,使用 R 软件筛选差异表达基因(DEGs),在 TargetScanHuman 和 miRTarBase 网站上预测 miRNA 靶标,基于重叠 DEGs 进行基因本体论(GO)术语和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路富集分析。使用 STRING 数据库和 Cytoscape 构建蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络并预测枢纽基因。然后,我们使用这些枢纽基因构建了一个随机森林模型来评估样本类型。

结果

GEO 数据集的生物信息学分析显示脓毒症中有 46 个重叠的 DEGs。PPI 网络分析确定了五个枢纽基因,SOCS3、KBTBD6、FBXL5、FEM1C 和 WSB1。基于这五个枢纽基因的随机森林模型用于评估 GSE95233 和 GSE95233 数据集,ROC 曲线下的面积(AUC)分别为 0.900 和 0.7988,证实了该模型的有效性。

结论

脓毒症基因表达的综合分析以及本研究中构建的有效随机森林模型,可能为脓毒症提供有前途的诊断方法。

相似文献

1
Identification of the Diagnostic Signature of Sepsis Based on Bioinformatic Analysis of Gene Expression and Machine Learning.基于基因表达和机器学习的生物信息学分析鉴定脓毒症诊断特征。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2022;25(1):21-28. doi: 10.2174/1386207323666201204130031.
2
Identification of differentially expressed genes, transcription factors, microRNAs and pathways in neutrophils of sepsis patients through bioinformatics analysis.通过生物信息学分析鉴定脓毒症患者中性粒细胞中差异表达的基因、转录因子、microRNAs 和通路。
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2022 Feb 4;67(5):405-420. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2021.67.5.53.
3
Identification of diagnostic candidate genes in COVID-19 patients with sepsis.鉴定 COVID-19 合并脓毒症患者的诊断候选基因。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Oct;12(10):e70033. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70033.
4
Identification of Key Inflammation-related Genes as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers of Sepsis.鉴定关键炎症相关基因作为脓毒症潜在诊断生物标志物。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Jul;29(5):24-31.
5
Identification and validation of oxidative stress-related genes in sepsis-induced myopathy.脓毒症诱导性肌病中氧化应激相关基因的鉴定与验证
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 3;103(18):e37933. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037933.
6
Analysis of Sepsis Markers and Pathogenesis Based on Gene Differential Expression and Protein Interaction Network.基于基因差异表达和蛋白质相互作用网络的脓毒症标志物和发病机制分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 12;2022:6878495. doi: 10.1155/2022/6878495. eCollection 2022.
7
A Three-gene-based Type 1 Diabetes Diagnostic Signature.基于三个基因的 1 型糖尿病诊断特征。
Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(24):2827-2833. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666201217143403.
8
[Construction of sepsis-associated competing endogenous RNA network based on Gene Expression Omnibus datasets and bioinformatic analysis].基于基因表达综合数据库和生物信息学分析构建脓毒症相关竞争性内源性RNA网络
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Apr;33(4):427-432. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210205-00211.
9
Bioinformatics Analysis Identifies Hub Genes and Molecular Pathways Involved in Sepsis-Induced Myopathy.生物信息学分析鉴定脓毒症诱导性肌病相关的枢纽基因和分子途径。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Feb 2;26:e919665. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919665.
10
Integrated bioinformatics combined with machine learning to analyze shared biomarkers and pathways in psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma.综合生物信息学结合机器学习分析银屑病和宫颈鳞状细胞癌中的共享生物标志物和通路。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 28;15:1351908. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1351908. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of Diagnostic Model for Regulatory T Cell-Related Genes in Sepsis Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习构建脓毒症中调节性T细胞相关基因的诊断模型
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 27;13(5):1060. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051060.
2
Multilevel omics for the discovery of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis.用于发现儿童脓毒症生物标志物的多组学研究
Pediatr Investig. 2023 Nov 21;7(4):277-289. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12405. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Identification of a Four-Gene Signature for Diagnosing Paediatric Sepsis.用于诊断小儿败血症的四基因标志物的鉴定。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 14;2022:5217885. doi: 10.1155/2022/5217885. eCollection 2022.