Haas G G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1987 Dec;14(4):1069-85.
In general, the management of antibody-mediated infertility has been plagued by misdiagnosis due to the choice of assay system, therapies that may be associated with major side effects, and a failure to learn from the models of other antibody-mediated diseases. An important consideration in diagnosing antibody-mediated infertility is to use an immunoglobulin-specific technique that employs intact or living spermatozoa. Once this is done, a search should be made for what functional deficits in reproduction are associated with the presence of the antisperm antibodies. This would include postcoital testing, tests for ovum penetration (human sperm/hamster egg penetration assay), and tests for the ability of the sperm in the presence of antibody to undergo the acrosome reaction. Once the extent of the reproductive deficit is known, appropriate therapy can then be suggested. I believe that a "case" must be built to prove that antibody-mediated fertility actually exists in a particular couple, even in the presence of a positive test that is known to be highly specific. Sperm antibodies can attach to the sperm's surface without detrimentally affecting reproductive function. In a similar vein, low levels of sperm antibodies could give a positive test result, but the level may be insufficient to be a major detriment to fertility. It is hoped that in the near future isolation of specific sperm antigens will be used to identify antibodies against antigens critical to reproductive function. It may be possible to determine the minimal amount of antisperm antibody that is necessary to disturb each individual step in reproductive function. If a patient is found to have sperm antibodies whose quantity exceeds this amount, then the patient can be appropriately labeled as having antibody-mediated infertility. The array of therapies available for the couple's unique fertility problem(s) can then be described to the patient, and an appropriate therapeutic choice made.
一般来说,抗体介导的不孕症管理一直因检测系统的选择导致误诊、可能伴有严重副作用的治疗方法以及未能借鉴其他抗体介导疾病的模型而备受困扰。诊断抗体介导的不孕症时,一个重要的考虑因素是使用针对完整或活精子的免疫球蛋白特异性技术。一旦完成此项操作,就应探寻与抗精子抗体存在相关的生殖功能缺陷。这包括性交后试验、卵子穿透试验(人精子/仓鼠卵穿透试验)以及在抗体存在情况下精子发生顶体反应能力的检测。一旦明确生殖功能缺陷的程度,便可提出适当的治疗方案。我认为,即使在已知高度特异的检测呈阳性的情况下,也必须构建一个“病例”来证明抗体介导的不孕在特定夫妇中实际存在。精子抗体可附着于精子表面而不损害生殖功能。同样,低水平的精子抗体可能会使检测结果呈阳性,但该水平可能不足以对生育造成重大损害。希望在不久的将来,通过分离特定的精子抗原来鉴定针对对生殖功能至关重要的抗原的抗体。或许有可能确定干扰生殖功能各个步骤所需的抗精子抗体的最小量。如果发现患者的精子抗体数量超过此量,那么该患者可被恰当地认定为患有抗体介导的不孕症。然后可向患者描述针对这对夫妇独特的生育问题的一系列治疗方法,并做出适当的治疗选择。