Kowalchuk Roman O, Waters Michael R, Richardson K Martin, Spencer Kelly, Larner James M, Sheehan Jason P, McAllister William H, Kersh Charles R
University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA.
University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2020;7(2):95-103.
This study compares the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for sacral and thoracolumbar spine metastases. This analysis considered each sacral spine SBRT treatment at a single institution and a cohort of consecutive thoracolumbar treatments. 28 patients with 35 sacral treatments and 41 patients with 49 thoracolumbar treatments were included. Local control was 63% and 90%, respectively. The sacral cohort contained more lesions with ≥2 vertebrae and epidural and paraspinal involvement. Sacral patients had larger treatment volumes, increased rates of subsequent SBRT, decreased propensity for pain improvement, and decreased local control (p=0.02 on Kaplan-Meier analysis). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PTV > 50 cc and epidural involvement were correlated with decreased local control. No cases had grade ≥3 toxicity. SBRT for sacral spine metastases is a distinct disease process than metastases to the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in lower rates of local control and pain improvement.
本研究比较了立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于骶骨及胸腰椎转移瘤的疗效。该分析纳入了在单一机构接受的每例骶骨SBRT治疗以及一组连续的胸腰椎治疗病例。纳入了28例接受35次骶骨治疗的患者和41例接受49次胸腰椎治疗的患者。局部控制率分别为63%和90%。骶骨组包含更多累及≥2个椎体以及硬膜外和椎旁受累的病灶。骶骨组患者的治疗体积更大,后续SBRT的发生率更高,疼痛改善倾向降低,局部控制率降低(Kaplan-Meier分析,p=0.02)。多因素分析表明,计划靶体积(PTV)>50 cc和硬膜外受累与局部控制率降低相关。无病例出现≥3级毒性反应。与胸腰椎转移瘤相比,骶骨转移瘤的SBRT是一个不同的疾病过程,导致局部控制率和疼痛改善率较低。