University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Nov;65(6):749-758. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13189. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Consent is a clear dialogue between individuals to engage in a specific activity. Expectations for consent to intimate examinations in health care should be equal to, if not exceed, expectations for intimate interactions in society. In reality, current definitions of consent in health care vary. These blurry definitions lead to individualized interpretation, incomplete fulfillment, and opportunities for misunderstanding by both patient and health care provider. If a patient does not believe they have consented to an examination or procedure, they are likely to rightfully identify with one of consent's antonyms, assault. Within the field of gynecology, a history of misogyny, racism, and classism illuminates abhorrent contexts of assault disguised as care. Similar practices persist in the modern application of pelvic care, ranging from overt sexual assault to coercion disguised as guidance. Health care providers and students who seek to improve consent practices can look to evidence-based frameworks such as trauma-informed care and shared decision making, both of which are embraced widely by professional organizations. These approaches often take precedence during the first pelvic examination; care for people who are lesbian, bisexual, queer, transgender, or nonbinary; and care for anyone with a known history of sexual assault; they can be easily extrapolated to all intimate examinations. Beyond obtaining consent for the examination itself, health care providers must also intentionally obtain consent to include students in care and openly discuss new universal recommendations for chaperone presence. Scripting for common procedures, such as bimanual examinations for pelvic care or cervical examinations in labor, allows health care providers to practice trauma-informed language, include evidence-based guidance, and avoid unintentional bias. Contemporary providers of intimate pelvic care must work to understand and strengthen the definition of consent and ensure its realization in practice.
同意是个人之间进行特定活动的明确对话。在医疗保健中进行亲密检查的同意期望应该与社会中亲密互动的期望相等,如果不是超过的话。实际上,医疗保健中同意的当前定义各不相同。这些模糊的定义导致了个体化的解释、不完整的履行以及患者和医疗保健提供者之间误解的机会。如果患者认为他们没有同意进行检查或程序,他们很可能会将自己与同意的反义词之一联系起来,即攻击。在妇科领域,厌恶女性、种族主义和阶级主义的历史揭示了伪装成护理的可恶攻击背景。类似的做法在现代骨盆护理的应用中仍然存在,从公然的性侵犯到伪装成指导的胁迫。寻求改善同意实践的医疗保健提供者和学生可以参考基于证据的框架,如创伤知情护理和共同决策,这些框架都得到了专业组织的广泛接受。这些方法通常在第一次骨盆检查期间优先考虑;为同性恋、双性恋、酷儿、跨性别或非二进制的人提供护理;并为有已知性侵犯史的人提供护理;它们可以很容易地推广到所有亲密检查。除了获得检查本身的同意外,医疗保健提供者还必须有意获得同意,允许学生参与护理,并公开讨论新的普遍建议,即增加陪同人员。为常见程序编写脚本,例如骨盆护理的双合诊检查或分娩时的宫颈检查,可以让医疗保健提供者练习创伤知情语言,包括基于证据的指导,并避免无意识的偏见。亲密盆腔护理的当代提供者必须努力理解和加强同意的定义,并确保在实践中实现同意。