Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;15(6):1439-1453. doi: 10.1111/eip.13081. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
While most users will not experience severe adverse health outcomes from cannabis, it can be associated with negative outcomes in people with psychosis. People with psychosis who use cannabis have more severe psychiatric symptoms, higher rates of hospitalization, and diminished psychosocial functioning compared to those who do not use cannabis. Most studies of people with psychotic disorders have focused on cannabis use treatments and only a few on preventive interventions for cannabis. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive interventions focusing on cannabis use for people with psychosis.
We searched CINAHL Plus, EBM reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo and PubMed databases for controlled studies assessing the effects of preventive interventions on cannabis use and related harms in people with psychosis. We conducted the search using a combination of the following concepts: cannabis, psychosis, intervention and prevention. Risk of bias was assessed.
The search yielded 11 460 unique studies. Of these, five studies met our eligibility criteria. None of the studies demonstrated clear efficacy of prevention interventions in reducing cannabis use, and none measured cannabis-related harms. All studies had high risk of bias.
The small number of studies and the considerable risk of bias made it difficult to conclude whether any of the existing interventions were promising. With increased acceptance and accessibility of cannabis due to liberalizing cannabis policies, it is imperative to improve the evidence base for preventive interventions, in particular their effectiveness in decreasing the risk of cannabis-related harms in people with psychosis.
尽管大多数使用者不会因大麻而产生严重的健康后果,但它可能会给精神病患者带来负面影响。与不使用大麻的精神病患者相比,使用大麻的精神病患者有更严重的精神症状、更高的住院率和更低的社会心理功能。大多数针对精神障碍患者的研究都集中在大麻使用治疗上,只有少数研究关注大麻预防干预。本系统评价旨在评估针对精神病患者大麻使用的预防干预措施的有效性。
我们在 CINAHL Plus、EBM 综述、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycInfo 和 PubMed 数据库中搜索了评估预防干预对精神病患者大麻使用和相关危害影响的对照研究。我们使用了以下概念的组合进行搜索:大麻、精神病、干预和预防。我们评估了偏倚风险。
搜索产生了 11460 项独特的研究。其中,五项研究符合我们的入选标准。没有一项研究表明预防干预在减少大麻使用方面有明显的效果,也没有一项研究测量了与大麻相关的危害。所有研究的偏倚风险都很高。
由于大麻政策的自由化,大麻的接受度和可及性增加,现有的干预措施是否有前景还很难得出结论。鉴于此,必须改善预防干预措施的证据基础,特别是它们在降低精神病患者与大麻相关危害风险方面的有效性。