Suppr超能文献

2020 年导管消融治疗心房颤动的解剖学靶点和预期结果。

Anatomical targets and expected outcomes of catheter-based ablation of atrial fibrillation in 2020.

机构信息

Department of Myocardial Pathophysiology, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Cardiovascular Institute, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):341-359. doi: 10.1111/pace.14140. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

Abstract

Anatomical-based approaches, targeting either pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or additional extra PV regions, represent the most commonly used ablation treatments in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy. PVI remains the main anatomical target during catheter-based AF ablation, with the aid of new technological advances as contact force monitoring to increase safety and effective radiofrequency (RF) lesions. Nowadays, cryoballoon ablation has also achieved the same level of scientific evidence in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI. In parallel, electrical isolation of extra PV targets has progressively increased, which is associated with a steady increase in complex cases undergoing ablation. Several atrial regions as the left atrial posterior wall, the vein of Marshall, the left atrial appendage, or the coronary sinus have been described in different series as locations potentially involved in AF initiation and maintenance. Targeting these regions may be challenging using conventional point-by-point RF delivery, which has opened new opportunities for coadjuvant alternatives as balloon ablation or selective ethanol injection. Although more extensive ablation may increase intraprocedural AF termination and freedom from arrhythmias during the follow-up, some of the targets to achieve such outcomes are not exempt of potential severe complications. Here, we review and discuss current anatomical approaches and the main ablation technologies to target atrial regions associated with AF initiation and maintenance.

摘要

基于解剖结构的方法,针对肺静脉隔离 (PVI) 或额外的肺静脉区域,是目前在有症状的心房颤动 (AF) 复发患者中,除抗心律失常药物治疗外,最常用的消融治疗方法。尽管接触力监测等新技术的进步有助于提高安全性和有效性的射频 (RF) 消融,但 PVI 仍然是导管消融 AF 时的主要解剖靶点。如今,冷冻球囊消融在接受 PVI 的阵发性 AF 患者中也已获得相同水平的科学证据。与此同时,额外的肺静脉靶点的电隔离也在逐步增加,这与接受消融治疗的复杂病例数量的稳步增加有关。在不同的研究中,已经描述了几个心房区域,如左心房后壁、Marshall 静脉、左心耳或冠状窦,这些区域可能与 AF 的发生和维持有关。使用传统的逐点 RF 输送来靶向这些区域可能具有挑战性,这为球囊消融或选择性乙醇注射等辅助替代方法提供了新的机会。虽然更广泛的消融可能会增加术中 AF 的终止率,并在随访期间提高无心律失常的比例,但为了实现这些目标而选择的一些靶点并不能免除潜在的严重并发症。在这里,我们回顾和讨论与 AF 发生和维持相关的当前解剖结构方法和主要消融技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验