Suppr超能文献

单支冠状动脉狭窄伴糖尿病患者与多支冠状动脉狭窄无糖尿病患者长期死亡率的比较。

Comparison of Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Single Coronary Narrowing and Diabetes Mellitus to That of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Narrowing Without Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;142:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Abstract

It is well recognized that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have poorer long-term outcomes compared with those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the relative impact of DM status and extent of coronary artery disease on long term mortality in patients undergoing PCI is unknown. We sought to compare patients with DM undergoing PCI for single and multivessel disease to their non-DM counterparts. Overall, 34,690 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry (2005 to 2017) were included (mean age 64.5 ± 12 years, 76.6% male). Our cohort was stratified by the presence of DM and extent of CAD (DM-SVD [single-vessel disease] [n = 2,669], DM-MVD [n = 6,118], no-DM-SVD [n = 10,993], no-DM-MVD [n = 14,910]). DM-SVD and no-DM-MVD cohorts demonstrated comparable baseline cardiovascular risk profiles, although the no-DM-MVD cohort had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction, while the DM-SVD cohort had a higher proportion of patients with renal impairment. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 (IQR 2.0 to 8.2) years, 6,031 (17.5%) patients died. Using the no-DM-SVD group as the reference category, adjusted risk of mortality was highest in the MVD-DM cohort (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.09). Similar adjusted risk of long-term mortality was observed in the DM-SVD (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.51) and no-DM-MVD (HR 1.30, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.40) groups. In conclusion, we found that the long-term mortality of patients with DM and SVD undergoing PCI was the risk equivalent of non-DM patients with MVD.

摘要

众所周知,相较于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,患有糖尿病(DM)和多支血管冠状动脉疾病(MVD)并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者具有更差的长期预后。然而,DM 状态和冠状动脉疾病的严重程度对接受 PCI 的患者长期死亡率的相对影响尚不清楚。我们旨在比较接受单支和多支血管疾病 PCI 的 DM 患者与其非 DM 患者。总体而言,从墨尔本介入组注册中心(2005 年至 2017 年)纳入 34690 例连续接受 PCI 的患者(平均年龄 64.5±12 岁,76.6%为男性)。我们的队列按 DM 存在和 CAD 程度进行分层(DM-SVD[单支血管疾病][n=2669],DM-MVD[n=6118],非-DM-SVD[n=10993],非-DM-MVD[n=14910])。DM-SVD 和非-DM-MVD 队列显示出可比的基线心血管风险特征,尽管非-DM-MVD 队列中先前心肌梗死的发生率更高,而 DM-SVD 队列中肾脏受损的患者比例更高。在中位数为 4.8 年(IQR 2.0 至 8.2)的随访期间,有 6031 例(17.5%)患者死亡。以非-DM-SVD 组为参考类别,MVD-DM 队列的死亡调整风险最高(HR 1.90;95%CI 1.71 至 2.09)。在 DM-SVD(HR 1.32,95%CI 1.15 至 1.51)和非-DM-MVD(HR 1.30,95%CI 1.20 至 1.40)组中也观察到相似的长期死亡风险调整。总之,我们发现接受 PCI 的 DM 和 SVD 患者的长期死亡率与接受 MVD 的非 DM 患者风险相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验