• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单支冠状动脉狭窄伴糖尿病患者与多支冠状动脉狭窄无糖尿病患者长期死亡率的比较。

Comparison of Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Single Coronary Narrowing and Diabetes Mellitus to That of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Narrowing Without Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;142:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.036
PMID:33285090
Abstract

It is well recognized that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have poorer long-term outcomes compared with those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, the relative impact of DM status and extent of coronary artery disease on long term mortality in patients undergoing PCI is unknown. We sought to compare patients with DM undergoing PCI for single and multivessel disease to their non-DM counterparts. Overall, 34,690 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry (2005 to 2017) were included (mean age 64.5 ± 12 years, 76.6% male). Our cohort was stratified by the presence of DM and extent of CAD (DM-SVD [single-vessel disease] [n = 2,669], DM-MVD [n = 6,118], no-DM-SVD [n = 10,993], no-DM-MVD [n = 14,910]). DM-SVD and no-DM-MVD cohorts demonstrated comparable baseline cardiovascular risk profiles, although the no-DM-MVD cohort had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction, while the DM-SVD cohort had a higher proportion of patients with renal impairment. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 (IQR 2.0 to 8.2) years, 6,031 (17.5%) patients died. Using the no-DM-SVD group as the reference category, adjusted risk of mortality was highest in the MVD-DM cohort (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.09). Similar adjusted risk of long-term mortality was observed in the DM-SVD (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.51) and no-DM-MVD (HR 1.30, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.40) groups. In conclusion, we found that the long-term mortality of patients with DM and SVD undergoing PCI was the risk equivalent of non-DM patients with MVD.

摘要

众所周知,相较于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,患有糖尿病(DM)和多支血管冠状动脉疾病(MVD)并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者具有更差的长期预后。然而,DM 状态和冠状动脉疾病的严重程度对接受 PCI 的患者长期死亡率的相对影响尚不清楚。我们旨在比较接受单支和多支血管疾病 PCI 的 DM 患者与其非 DM 患者。总体而言,从墨尔本介入组注册中心(2005 年至 2017 年)纳入 34690 例连续接受 PCI 的患者(平均年龄 64.5±12 岁,76.6%为男性)。我们的队列按 DM 存在和 CAD 程度进行分层(DM-SVD[单支血管疾病][n=2669],DM-MVD[n=6118],非-DM-SVD[n=10993],非-DM-MVD[n=14910])。DM-SVD 和非-DM-MVD 队列显示出可比的基线心血管风险特征,尽管非-DM-MVD 队列中先前心肌梗死的发生率更高,而 DM-SVD 队列中肾脏受损的患者比例更高。在中位数为 4.8 年(IQR 2.0 至 8.2)的随访期间,有 6031 例(17.5%)患者死亡。以非-DM-SVD 组为参考类别,MVD-DM 队列的死亡调整风险最高(HR 1.90;95%CI 1.71 至 2.09)。在 DM-SVD(HR 1.32,95%CI 1.15 至 1.51)和非-DM-MVD(HR 1.30,95%CI 1.20 至 1.40)组中也观察到相似的长期死亡风险调整。总之,我们发现接受 PCI 的 DM 和 SVD 患者的长期死亡率与接受 MVD 的非 DM 患者风险相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Single Coronary Narrowing and Diabetes Mellitus to That of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Narrowing Without Diabetes Mellitus.单支冠状动脉狭窄伴糖尿病患者与多支冠状动脉狭窄无糖尿病患者长期死亡率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;142:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
2
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Men versus Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.男性与女性行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Aug 15;153:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Following Coronary Revascularization in Men-vs-Women with Unprotected Left Main Disease.男性与女性非保护左主干病变患者冠状动脉血运重建后长期结局的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Aug 15;153:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
4
Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention relative to bypass surgery in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease according to clinical presentation.根据临床表现,糖尿病多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗的长期预后比较。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Mar;31(2):174-183. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000767.
5
Outcomes of Individuals With and Without Heart Failure Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome.患有和不患有心力衰竭的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated Versus Non-Insulin Treated Diabetes Mellitus.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者的长期结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;148:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
7
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.糖尿病患者经生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的 5 年结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013607. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Comparing mortality between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in elderly with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease.比较老年糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的死亡率。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1424-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0746-1. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Prognostic Relation Between Severity of Diabetes Mellitus (On or Off Insulin) ± Chronic Kidney Disease with Cardiovascular Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.糖尿病严重程度(使用或不使用胰岛素) ± 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心血管风险与慢性肾脏病的预后关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 15;121(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
10
Mortality after percutaneous coronary revascularization: Prior cardiovascular risk factor control and improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus.经皮冠状动脉血运重建术后的死亡率:既往心血管危险因素控制与糖尿病患者预后改善
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1195-1204. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26882. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel grading system for ischemia‒reperfusion injury manifestations in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血再灌注损伤表现的新型分级系统。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 11;12(1):19349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24019-6.