Suppr超能文献

单纯收缩期高血压和单纯舒张期高血压的漏诊。

Underdiagnosis of Isolated Systolic and Isolated Diastolic Hypertension.

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Department of Neuroscience, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, CA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;141:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Abstract

Systolic and diastolic hypertension independently predict the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. It remains unclear how systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and other patient characteristics influence the initial diagnosis of hypertension. Here, we use a cohort of 146,816 adults in a large healthcare system to examine how elevated systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure measurements influence initial diagnosis of hypertension and how other patient characteristics influence the diagnosis. Thirty-four percent of the cohort were diagnosed with hypertension within 1 year. In multivariable logistic regression of the diagnosis of hypertension, controlling for covariates, isolated systolic hypertensive measures (odds ratio [OR] 0.42 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.41 to 0.43]) and isolated diastolic hypertensive measures (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.31 to 0.33]) were less likely to lead to hypertension diagnosis when compared with combined hypertensive measures. Higher levels of systolic blood pressure had a greater impact on hypertension diagnosis (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.75 to 1.79] per Z-score) than did higher levels of diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.34 [95% CI 1.32 to 1.36] per Z-score). Older age, non-white race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities all predicted the establishment of a diagnosis of hypertension. Isolated systolic and isolated diastolic hypertension are underdiagnosed in clinical practice, and several patient-centered factors also strongly influence whether a diagnosis is made. In conclusion, our findings uncover a care gap that can be closed with increased attention to the independent influence of systolic and diastolic hypertension and the various patient-centered factors that may impact hypertension diagnosis.

摘要

收缩压和舒张压独立预测不良心血管事件的风险。目前尚不清楚收缩压、舒张压和其他患者特征如何影响高血压的初始诊断。在这里,我们使用一个大型医疗保健系统中的 146816 名成年人队列来检查升高的收缩压和/或舒张压测量值如何影响高血压的初始诊断,以及其他患者特征如何影响诊断。该队列中有 34%的人在一年内被诊断为高血压。在多变量逻辑回归高血压的诊断中,控制混杂因素后,孤立性收缩期高血压测量值(比值比 [OR] 0.42 [95%置信区间 {CI} 0.41 至 0.43])和孤立性舒张期高血压测量值(OR 0.32 [95%CI 0.31 至 0.33])与联合高血压测量值相比,不太可能导致高血压诊断。更高水平的收缩压对高血压诊断的影响更大(OR 1.77 [95%CI 1.75 至 1.79]每 Z 评分),而舒张压水平升高的影响较小(OR 1.34 [95%CI 1.32 至 1.36]每 Z 评分)。年龄较大、非白种人种族/民族和合并症都预测了高血压的诊断。在临床实践中,孤立性收缩期高血压和孤立性舒张期高血压被低估了,几个以患者为中心的因素也强烈影响是否做出诊断。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了一个护理差距,可以通过增加对收缩压和舒张压的独立影响以及可能影响高血压诊断的各种以患者为中心的因素的关注来缩小这一差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验