Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, 11, Samjeongjaro, Seongsangu, Changwonsi, Republic of Korea, 51472.
Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, 11, Samjeongjaro, Seongsangui, Changwonsi, Republic of Korea.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07700-9.
We aimed to identify whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are more useful predictors after initial intention to treat than at the time of diagnosis.
We collected the medical data of 533 patients. The results of the peripheral blood sampling before the primary treatments were labeled as initial cohort, and those obtained between 24 and 36 months after initial treatment were defined as the 2nd cohort. Delayed metastasis has been defined as distant metastasis 2 years after treatment, and survival outcome was estimated and compared across groups.
Median follow-up duration was 74 months (24-162 months), and 53 patients experienced delayed metastasis. In univariate analysis, metastasis-free survival, patient age at diagnosis, tumor size, axillary lymph node metastasis, HER-2 status, initial NLR and PLR, and 2nd NLR and PLR were found to be significantly associated with delayed metastasis. However, in multivariate analysis, only the 2nd NLR and PLR were found to be significantly associated with delayed metastasis, excluding initial NLR and PLR. Metastasis-free survival was analyzed through the pattern changes of NLR or PLR. The results revealed that patients with continued low NLR and PLR values at pre- and post-treatment (low initial values and 2nd values) showed a significantly better prognosis than those with a change in value or continued high NLR and PLR.
We identified that patients with persistent high NLR and PLR after initial treatment have significant worse prognosis in terms of late metastasis. Therefore, these results suggest that NLR and PLR are more useful in predicting prognosis post-treatment.
我们旨在确定中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在初始意向治疗后是否比诊断时更能预测。
我们收集了 533 名患者的医疗数据。将初始治疗前的外周血样本结果标记为初始队列,将初始治疗后 24-36 个月获得的结果定义为第 2 队列。延迟转移定义为治疗后 2 年内的远处转移,通过比较各组的生存结果来估计和比较。
中位随访时间为 74 个月(24-162 个月),53 例患者发生延迟转移。在单因素分析中,无转移生存、诊断时患者年龄、肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移、HER-2 状态、初始 NLR 和 PLR 以及第 2 个 NLR 和 PLR 与延迟转移显著相关。然而,在多因素分析中,只有第 2 个 NLR 和 PLR 与延迟转移显著相关,而初始 NLR 和 PLR 则不相关。通过 NLR 或 PLR 的变化模式分析无转移生存。结果表明,治疗前和治疗后 NLR 和 PLR 值持续较低(初始值和第 2 个值较低)的患者预后明显优于值变化或 NLR 和 PLR 持续较高的患者。
我们发现,初始治疗后持续高 NLR 和 PLR 的患者在晚期转移方面预后明显较差。因此,这些结果表明 NLR 和 PLR 在预测治疗后预后方面更有用。