• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发数据驱动的 COVID-19 预后工具,以指导香港住院患者的分诊和降阶梯治疗:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Development of a data-driven COVID-19 prognostication tool to inform triage and step-down care for hospitalised patients in Hong Kong: a population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Statistics and Data Science Department, Hospital Authority, Hospital Authority Building, 147B Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Strategy and Planning Division, Hospital Authority, Hospital Authority Building, 147B Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01338-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-01338-0
PMID:33287804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7719738/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is the first study on prognostication in an entire cohort of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients in the city of Hong Kong. Prognostic tool is essential in the contingency response for the next wave of outbreak. This study aims to develop prognostic models to predict COVID-19 patients' clinical outcome on day 1 and day 5 of hospital admission.

METHODS

We did a retrospective analysis of a complete cohort of 1037 COVID-19 laboratory-confirmed patients in Hong Kong as of 30 April 2020, who were admitted to 16 public hospitals with their data sourced from an integrated electronic health records system. It covered demographic information, chronic disease(s) history, presenting symptoms as well as the worst clinical condition status, biomarkers' readings and Ct value of PCR tests on Day-1 and Day-5 of admission. The study subjects were randomly split into training and testing datasets in a 8:2 ratio. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was used to classify the training data into three disease severity groups on Day-1 and Day-5.

RESULTS

The 1037 patients had a mean age of 37.8 (SD ± 17.8), 53.8% of them were male. They were grouped under three disease outcome: 4.8% critical/serious, 46.8% stable and 48.4% satisfactory. Under the full models, 30 indicators on Day-1 and Day-5 were used to predict the patients' disease outcome and achieved an accuracy rate of 92.3% and 99.5%. With a trade-off between practical application and predictive accuracy, the full models were reduced into simpler models with seven common specific predictors, including the worst clinical condition status (4-level), age group, and five biomarkers, namely, CRP, LDH, platelet, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and albumin/globulin ratio. Day-1 model's accuracy rate, macro-/micro-averaged sensitivity and specificity were 91.3%, 84.9%/91.3% and 96.0%/95.7% respectively, as compared to 94.2%, 95.9%/94.2% and 97.8%/97.1% under Day-5 model.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Day-1 and Day-5 models can accurately predict the disease severity. Relevant clinical management could be planned according to the predicted patients' outcome. The model is transformed into a simple online calculator to provide convenient clinical reference tools at the point of care, with an aim to inform clinical decision on triage and step-down care.

摘要

背景

这是首例针对香港确诊 COVID-19 患者整个人群进行预后预测的研究。在应对下一波疫情时,预后工具至关重要。本研究旨在建立预测模型,以预测 COVID-19 患者入院第 1 天和第 5 天的临床结局。

方法

我们对截至 2020 年 4 月 30 日香港 1037 例经实验室确诊的 COVID-19 患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者被收治在 16 家公立医院,数据来源于综合电子健康记录系统。该系统涵盖了人口统计学信息、慢性病史、入院时的症状以及最严重的临床状况、生物标志物读数和入院第 1 天和第 5 天的 PCR 检测 Ct 值。研究对象按照 8:2 的比例随机分为训练数据集和测试数据集。使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型将训练数据分为第 1 天和第 5 天的三个疾病严重程度组。

结果

1037 例患者的平均年龄为 37.8(标准差±17.8),其中 53.8%为男性。他们被分为三种疾病结局:4.8%为危急/严重,46.8%为稳定,48.4%为满意。在全模型下,第 1 天和第 5 天使用 30 个指标预测患者的疾病结局,准确率分别为 92.3%和 99.5%。为了在实际应用和预测精度之间取得平衡,将全模型简化为包含七个常见特定预测因子的模型,包括最严重的临床状况(4 级)、年龄组和五种生物标志物,即 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、血小板、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和白蛋白/球蛋白比值。第 1 天模型的准确率、宏观/微观平均敏感度和特异度分别为 91.3%、84.9%/91.3%和 96.0%/95.7%,而第 5 天模型的准确率、宏观/微观平均敏感度和特异度分别为 94.2%、95.9%/94.2%和 97.8%/97.1%。

结论

第 1 天和第 5 天模型均能准确预测疾病严重程度。可根据预测的患者结局进行相关临床管理。该模型已转化为一个简单的在线计算器,以便在护理点提供方便的临床参考工具,旨在为分诊和降阶梯护理提供临床决策依据。

相似文献

1
Development of a data-driven COVID-19 prognostication tool to inform triage and step-down care for hospitalised patients in Hong Kong: a population-based cohort study.开发数据驱动的 COVID-19 预后工具,以指导香港住院患者的分诊和降阶梯治疗:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01338-0.
2
Admission triage tool for adult intensive care unit admission in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 outbreak.香港 COVID-19 疫情期间成人重症监护病房收治的入院分诊工具。
Hong Kong Med J. 2022 Feb;28(1):64-72. doi: 10.12809/hkmj209033. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Prognostication in severe acute respiratory syndrome: a retrospective time-course analysis of 1312 laboratory-confirmed patients in Hong Kong.严重急性呼吸综合征的预后评估:对香港1312例实验室确诊患者的回顾性时间进程分析
Respirology. 2007 Jul;12(4):531-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01102.x.
4
Automated Triage System for Intensive Care Admissions during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Hybrid XGBoost-AHP Approach.基于混合 XGBoost-AHP 方法的 COVID-19 大流行期间重症监护入院的自动分诊系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;21(19):6379. doi: 10.3390/s21196379.
5
Twenty-eight-day mortality among patients with severe or critical COVID-19 in Hong Kong during the early stages of the pandemic.香港在大流行早期严重或危重新冠肺炎患者的 28 天死亡率。
Hong Kong Med J. 2023 Oct;29(5):383-395. doi: 10.12809/hkmj219876. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
COVID-19 Chest CT Quantification: Triage and Prognostic Value in Different Ages.COVID-19 胸部 CT 量化:不同年龄段的分诊和预后价值。
Clin Med Res. 2023 Mar;21(1):14-25. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2023.1772.
7
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
8
A Practical Clinical Score Predicting Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients.一种预测 COVID-19 患者呼吸衰竭的实用临床评分。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 May;24(5):327-331.
9
Development and validation of a simple risk score for diagnosing COVID-19 in the emergency room.开发和验证一种用于急诊科诊断 COVID-19 的简单风险评分。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Nov 13;148:e273. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002769.
10
Application of boosted trees to the prognosis prediction of COVID-19.增强树在新型冠状病毒肺炎预后预测中的应用
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 22;7(5):e2104. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2104. eCollection 2024 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal timing of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment after COVID-19 symptom onset or diagnosis: target trial emulation.奈玛特韦/利托那韦治疗 COVID-19 症状出现或确诊后的最佳时机:目标试验模拟。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 16;14(1):8377. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43706-0.
2
Outcome prediction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Comparison of the performance of five severity scores.住院COVID-19患者的预后预测:五种严重程度评分的性能比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;10:1121465. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1121465. eCollection 2023.
3
Viral burden rebound in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving oral antivirals in Hong Kong: a population-wide retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study.《纽约市 COVID-19 重症成人的流行病学、临床病程和结局:一项前瞻性队列研究》
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1763-1770. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.开发和验证一种临床风险评分,以预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生危重症的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033.
3
Whose coronavirus strategy worked best? Scientists hunt most effective policies.
香港一项全人群回顾性队列研究显示,接受口服抗病毒药物治疗的 COVID-19 住院患者病毒载量反弹。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jun;23(6):683-695. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00873-8. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
Comparison of machine learning methods with logistic regression analysis in creating predictive models for risk of critical in-hospital events in COVID-19 patients on hospital admission.比较机器学习方法与逻辑回归分析在建立 COVID-19 患者入院时危重症院内事件风险预测模型中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02057-4.
5
Are platelet volume indices of clinical use in COVID-19? A systematic review.血小板体积指数在新型冠状病毒肺炎中有临床应用价值吗?一项系统评价。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 18;9:1031092. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1031092. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on HIM Professionals in a Rural State.农村州内 COVID-19 大流行对医疗信息管理人员的影响。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Mar 15;19(Spring):1c. eCollection 2022 Spring.
7
Optimising the balance of acute and intermediate care capacity for the complex discharge pathway: Computer modelling study during COVID-19 recovery in England.优化急性和中期护理能力的平衡,以适应复杂的出院途径:英格兰在 COVID-19 恢复期的计算机建模研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 7;17(6):e0268837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268837. eCollection 2022.
8
Prognostic value of albumin-to-globulin ratio in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白与球蛋白比值在新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中的预后价值:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2022 May 18;8(5):e09457. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09457. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Prognosis patients with COVID-19 using deep learning.使用深度学习技术预测 COVID-19 患者的预后。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01820-x.
10
Incorporating temporal distribution of population-level viral load enables real-time estimation of COVID-19 transmission.将人群水平病毒载量的时间分布纳入其中,可实时估计 COVID-19 的传播。
Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 3;13(1):1155. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28812-9.
谁的新冠病毒应对策略最有效?科学家探寻最有效的政策。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7806):15-16. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01248-1.
4
Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.危重症和死亡 COVID-19 病例的风险因素:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):e16-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019.免疫炎症参数评估 2019 年冠状病毒病严重程度的临床价值。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
A retrospective study of risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in hospitalized adult patients.一项关于住院成年患者中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 感染危险因素的回顾性研究。
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020 May 29;130(5):390-399. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15312. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
7
D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19.入院时 D-二聚体水平预测 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1324-1329. doi: 10.1111/jth.14859.
8
Risk Factors of Fatal Outcome in Hospitalized Subjects With Coronavirus Disease 2019 From a Nationwide Analysis in China.中国全国范围内分析的 2019 年冠状病毒病住院患者死亡结局的危险因素。
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
9
Risk factors for disease severity, unimprovement, and mortality in COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China.中国武汉 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度、无改善和死亡率的危险因素。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jun;26(6):767-772. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.