Ferrando Núria, Araque Isabel, Ortís Alba, Thornes Gabriel, Bautista-Gallego Joaquín, Bordons Albert, Reguant Cristina
Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Grup de Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, C/ M. Domingo 1, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas (Área de Microbiología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz 06006, Spain.
Food Res Int. 2020 Dec;138(Pt B):109779. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109779. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Interest in using non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking has increased in recent years due to their ability to improve wine quality. However, little information has been published regarding the possible effect on malolactic fermentation (MLF), carried out mostly by Oenococcus oeni. The aim of this paper is therefore to evaluate the effect of the most representative non-Saccharomyces species on O. oeni and wine MLF. Different strains of Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Hanseniaspora vineae and Starmerella bacillaris (syn. Candida zemplinina) were used in sequential alcoholic fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The resulting wines were inoculated with four O. oeni strains. The action of non-Saccharomyces affected the final wine composition and the later role of O. oeni. Some of its strains could not perform MLF in H. uvarum wine due to high SO concentrations. In some cases, MLF was inhibited in wines inoculated with S. bacillaris. All the H. uvarum and H. vineae strains notably increased acetic acid concentrations, thus threatening wine quality. The best conditions for MLF were provided by some T. delbruecckii and M. pulcherrima strains, which showed increased concentrations of mannoproteins - compounds described as MLF activators -, no production of SO, and low consumption of L-malic acid. In conclusion, non-Saccharomyces yeasts have diverse effects on O. oeni and MLF depending on the species, with T. delbrueckii and M. pulcherrima being those that showed the best compatibility with MLF development.
近年来,由于非酿酒酵母能够提升葡萄酒品质,其在酿酒过程中的应用备受关注。然而,关于其对主要由酒类酒球菌进行的苹果酸-乳酸发酵(MLF)可能产生的影响,相关报道甚少。因此,本文旨在评估最具代表性的非酿酒酵母品种对酒类酒球菌及葡萄酒MLF的影响。将不同菌株的戴尔布有孢圆酵母、美极梅奇酵母、葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母、维纳有孢汉逊酵母和拜耳接合酵母(同义词:泽姆林念珠菌)与酿酒酵母进行顺序酒精发酵。将所得葡萄酒接种四种酒类酒球菌菌株。非酿酒酵母的作用影响了最终葡萄酒的成分以及酒类酒球菌的后续作用。部分菌株因高二氧化硫浓度无法在葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母葡萄酒中进行MLF。在某些情况下,接种拜耳接合酵母的葡萄酒中MLF受到抑制。所有葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母和维纳有孢汉逊酵母菌株均显著提高了乙酸浓度,从而对葡萄酒品质构成威胁。一些戴尔布有孢圆酵母和美极梅奇酵母菌株为MLF提供了最佳条件,这些菌株显示出甘露糖蛋白(被描述为MLF激活剂的化合物)浓度增加、不产生二氧化硫以及低苹果酸消耗量。总之,非酿酒酵母对酒类酒球菌和MLF的影响因品种而异,戴尔布有孢圆酵母和美极梅奇酵母与MLF发展的兼容性最佳。