Suppr超能文献

腓浅神经副动脉(SPNAA)皮瓣在头颈部重建中的应用:尸体解剖学研究和回顾性病例系列研究。

Superficial peroneal nerve accessory artery (SPNAA) flap for head and neck reconstruction: A cadaveric anatomical study and retrospective case series review.

机构信息

Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jul;74(7):1524-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several different flaps can reconstruct intraoral defects or lower limb deficits after free fibula osteo-cutaneous flap harvesting for jaw reconstructions. However, commonly used options may not be available for various reasons and can be associated with significant morbidity. We hypothesized that flaps supplied by the superficial peroneal nerve accessory artery (SPNAA) could be a viable alternative reconstructive option.

METHODS

We describe the SPNAA's anatomy using 20 human cadaveric leg dissections and report eight cases involving SPNAA-based perforator flap reconstructions (six propeller flaps and two free flaps) in a retrospective case series. Patient-specific baseline variables and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes are described.

RESULTS

Cadaveric dissection suggests that the location of the SPNAA is reliable but its origin varies, with 40% (N = 8) of SPNAAs being of type I origin, 20% type II (N = 4), and 40% (N = 8) type III in our series. All reconstructions were successful. No intraoperative complications occurred during propeller or free-flap reconstructions. No flap failures occurred. One propeller reconstruction showed distal superficial skin necrosis and one donor site wound dehisced; both were successfully managed conservatively. No other short-term or long-term complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Flaps based on SPNAA perforators appear effective, reliable, and safe reconstructive methods for covering fibula osteocutaneous donor site defects and for intraoral reconstructions. Controlled trials are required to compare its effectiveness and safety with other reconstructive methods.

摘要

背景

游离腓骨骨皮瓣用于下颌骨重建后,可通过多种不同的皮瓣重建口内缺损或下肢缺损。然而,由于各种原因,通常使用的选择可能不可用,并且可能与显著的发病率相关。我们假设,由腓浅神经副动脉(SPNAA)供应的皮瓣可能是一种可行的替代重建选择。

方法

我们通过 20 个人体尸体小腿解剖来描述 SPNAA 的解剖结构,并在回顾性病例系列中报告了 8 例涉及 SPNAA 为基础的穿支皮瓣重建(6 例推进瓣和 2 例游离皮瓣)的病例。描述了患者特定的基线变量以及术中及术后结果。

结果

尸体解剖表明 SPNAA 的位置是可靠的,但它的起源是不同的,在我们的系列中,40%(N=8)的 SPNAAs 为 I 型起源,20%(N=4)为 II 型,40%(N=8)为 III 型。所有重建均成功。推进瓣或游离皮瓣重建过程中无术中并发症发生。无皮瓣失败。一例推进瓣重建显示远端浅部皮肤坏死,一例供区伤口裂开;两者均经保守治疗成功处理。无其他短期或长期并发症发生。

结论

基于 SPNAA 穿支的皮瓣似乎是覆盖腓骨骨皮瓣供区缺损和口腔内重建的有效、可靠和安全的重建方法。需要进行对照试验来比较其与其他重建方法的有效性和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验