The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, Willow Grove, PA, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2021 May;66(3):1017-1023. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14646. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Serological screening of sexual assault evidence has traditionally focused on enzyme activity and immunochromatographic assays that provide only a presumptive indication of seminal fluid and have limited sensitivity relative to DNA testing. Seminal fluid detection based on protein mass spectrometry represents a "Next Gen" serological technology that overcomes the specificity and sensitivity limitations of traditional serological screening but requires time-consuming sample preparation protocols. This paper describes a novel "peptidomics" approach to seminal fluid detection that eliminates the need for lengthy trypsin digestion. This streamlines sample preparation to a one-step process followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify naturally occurring seminal fluid peptides and low-molecular weight proteins. Multiple protein biomarkers of seminal fluid were consistently and confidently identified based on the multiplexed detection of numerous endogenous peptides. These included Semenogelin I and II (90% and 86% sequence coverage, respectively); Prostate Specific Antigen/p30 (29% sequence coverage); and Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (24% sequence coverage). The performance of this streamlined peptidomics approach to seminal fluid identification in a forensic context was also assessed using simulated casework samples of the type typically collected as part of a sexual assault examination (e.g., oral and vaginal swabs stained with semen). The resulting data demonstrate that sub-microliter quantities of seminal fluid on cotton swabs can be recovered and reliably detected. This supports the forensic applicability of a peptidomic assay for seminal fluid identification with same-day sample preparation and analysis. Future development and streamlined multiplex peptidomic assays for additional biological stains can easily be envisaged.
性侵犯证据的血清学筛查传统上侧重于酶活性和免疫层析分析,这些方法只能提供精液的推定指示,与 DNA 检测相比,其灵敏度有限。基于蛋白质质谱的精液检测代表了一种“下一代”血清学技术,它克服了传统血清学筛查的特异性和灵敏度限制,但需要耗时的样品制备方案。本文描述了一种新颖的“肽组学”方法来检测精液,该方法消除了对冗长的胰蛋白酶消化的需求。这将样品制备简化为一个一步法,然后进行高分辨率质谱分析,以鉴定天然存在的精液肽和低分子量蛋白质。基于对许多内源性肽的多重检测,一致且有信心地鉴定出多种精液蛋白生物标志物。这些包括精液蛋白 I 和 II(分别为 90%和 86%的序列覆盖率);前列腺特异性抗原/p30(29%的序列覆盖率);和前列腺酸性磷酸酶(24%的序列覆盖率)。还使用性侵犯检查中通常收集的模拟案例样本(例如,用精液染色的口腔和阴道拭子)评估了这种简化肽组学方法在法医背景下鉴定精液的性能。所得数据表明,可以从棉签上的亚微升精液中回收并可靠地检测到微量的精液。这支持了肽组学分析用于精液鉴定的法医适用性,可实现当天的样品制备和分析。可以轻松设想针对其他生物痕迹的简化多重肽组学分析的未来发展。