Suppr超能文献

延迟性肌肉酸痛和咀嚼肌神经生长因子注射的实验模型中疼痛引起的功能结果比较。

Comparison of Pain-Generated Functional Outcomes in Experimental Models of Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness and Nerve Growth Factor Injection of the Masticatory Muscles.

出版信息

J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2020;34(4):311-322. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2623.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare two pain models of myalgic TMD, delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and injections of nerve growth factor (NGF), in terms of pain-related and motor function outcomes, as well as activity-related temporal summation.

METHODS

Fifty age- and gender-matched healthy participants were recruited and randomized into one of three groups: to a repeated eccentric contraction task to cause DOMS (n = 20), to receive NGF injections into the masseter muscle (n = 20), or to a control group (n = 10). Mechanical sensitivity of masticatory muscles, chewing parameters, jaw function limitation, maximum bite force, and activity-related temporal summation were assessed at baseline and at days 1, 2, and 7 following the intervention.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, both model groups showed increased mechanical sensitivity, jaw function limitation, pain on chewing, and decreased chewing efficiency, lasting longer in the NGF group than in the DOMS group (P < .05). Furthermore, also compared to baseline, the NGF group showed increased pain on maximum bite and decreased pain-free maximum opening (P < .05). No increases in activity-related temporal summation were shown for any of the model groups when compared to baseline or the control group (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Both models produced similar pain-related outcomes, with the NGF model having a longer effect. Furthermore, the NGF model showed a more substantial effect on motor function, which was not seen for the DOMS model. Finally, neither of the models were able to provoke activity-related temporal summation of pain.

摘要

目的

比较两种肌筋膜性 TMD 疼痛模型(迟发性肌肉酸痛 DOMS 和神经生长因子 NGF 注射)在疼痛相关和运动功能结果以及与活动相关的时间总和方面的差异。

方法

招募了 50 名年龄和性别匹配的健康参与者,并将其随机分为三组:重复离心收缩任务引起 DOMS(n = 20)、将 NGF 注射到咬肌(n = 20)或对照组(n = 10)。在干预后的第 1、2 和 7 天,评估咀嚼肌的机械敏感性、咀嚼参数、下颌功能受限、最大咬合力和与活动相关的时间总和。

结果

与基线相比,两组模型组的机械敏感性、下颌功能受限、咀嚼时疼痛以及咀嚼效率均增加,NGF 组的持续时间长于 DOMS 组(P <.05)。此外,与基线相比,NGF 组的最大咬合力疼痛增加,无痛最大开口减小(P <.05)。与基线或对照组相比,任何模型组的与活动相关的时间总和均未增加(P >.05)。

结论

两种模型均产生了相似的疼痛相关结果,而 NGF 模型的效果持续时间更长。此外,NGF 模型对运动功能的影响更大,而 DOMS 模型则没有。最后,两种模型均未能引起疼痛的与活动相关的时间总和。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验