J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2020;34(4):364-373. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2670.
To study the effect and cost-effectiveness of jaw exercise treatment in patients with masticatory myofascial pain.
A total of 97 patients with myofascial pain according to the RDC/TMD were randomized into three groups: (1) jaw exercises; (2) stabilization appliance; or (3) no treatment. After 3 months, the patients were evaluated according to the following instruments: pain intensity according to a visual analog scale (VAS); global improvement according to the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC); depression and anxiety according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); jaw function according to the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-20); consumption of analgesics; and frequency of tension-type headache.
Pain intensity during jaw movement decreased significantly more in the jaw exercise group compared to the no treatment group (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between the jaw exercise and stabilization appliance groups in this aspect. The patients in the treatment groups reported greater improvement on the PGIC compared to the no treatment group (P < .001). There was a significant decrease in headache frequency (P = .028), consumption of analgesics (P = .007), and JFLS scores (P = .008) in the jaw exercise group compared to the no treatment group. In the jaw exercise group, patients had fewer appointments and a lower mean treatment time compared to the group that received stabilization appliance treatment.
Jaw exercises are effective in reducing pain intensity, headache, and consumption of analgesics in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. Jaw exercises are also cost-effective when compared to treatment with a stabilization appliance.
研究咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛患者进行颌运动治疗的效果和成本效益。
共有 97 名符合 RDC/TMD 标准的肌筋膜疼痛患者被随机分为三组:(1)颌运动治疗;(2)稳定器治疗;或(3)无治疗。3 个月后,根据以下仪器评估患者:根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度;根据患者总体印象变化量表(PGIC)评估整体改善;根据医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评估抑郁和焦虑;根据颌功能限制量表(JFLS-20)评估颌功能;评估镇痛药的使用情况;评估紧张型头痛的频率。
与无治疗组相比,颌运动组的颌运动时疼痛强度显著降低(P<0.001)。在这方面,颌运动组与稳定器组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。与无治疗组相比,治疗组的患者在 PGIC 上报告的改善更大(P<0.001)。与无治疗组相比,颌运动组的头痛频率(P=0.028)、镇痛药使用量(P=0.007)和 JFLS 评分(P=0.008)均显著降低。与接受稳定器治疗的组相比,颌运动组的患者就诊次数更少,平均治疗时间更短。
颌运动治疗可有效减轻咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛患者的疼痛强度、头痛和镇痛药使用量。与稳定器治疗相比,颌运动治疗具有成本效益。