Suppr超能文献

与高效液相色谱法相比,傅里叶变换红外光谱结合化学计量工具(指纹光谱法):哪种策略作为药物分析的绿色分析化学技术提供了更多机会。

FTIR combined with chemometric tools (fingerprinting spectroscopy) in comparison to HPLC: which strategy offers more opportunities as a green analytical chemistry technique for pharmaceutical analysis.

作者信息

Kelani Khadiga M, Rezk Mamdouh R, Monir Hany H, ElSherbiny Menna S, Eid Sherif M

机构信息

Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, El-Kasr El-Aini Street, ET-11562 Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Anal Methods. 2020 Dec 23;12(48):5893-5907. doi: 10.1039/d0ay01749c.

Abstract

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is a widespread technique that can provide a chemical signature (fingerprints) of solid, liquid, or gas samples with a wide range of analytical applications. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is a leading analytical strategy for pharmaceutical analysis. Here we present a side-by-side comparison of the potential of these techniques for quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical active ingredient combinations in light of green analytical chemistry (GAC) principles. The methods were successfully applied for the analysis of ketoprofen (KTP)/hyoscine (HYS) and benzocaine (BENZ)/dextromethorphan HBr (DEX) in their binary mixtures and pharmaceutical preparations. In FTIR analysis, calibration models were constructed based on partial least squares regression (PLSR) with satisfactory regression coefficients (r2) of 0.9998, 0.9994, 0.9855, and 0.9895 for KTP, HYS, DEX, and BENZ, respectively, over a wide linearity range (10-100, 10-100, 5-75, and 10-100 μg mL-1) that covers the concentration ratios in the market samples. External validation using a validation set and internal validation using leave-one-out-cross-validation calculations were performed, and small root-mean-square-error-of-cross-validation (RMSECV) values were obtained indicating the good resolving power of the models. The same performance was obtained using the HPLC method for separation of the same mixtures with r2 equal to 0.9998, 0.9999, 0.9998, and 0.9998 over linear ranges of 50-1000, 10-200, 5-100, and 5-100 μg mL-1 for KTP, HYS, DEX, and BENZ, respectively. The HPLC methods were validated following ICH guidelines with good recovery percentages in the range of 98-100%. The statistical comparison of the FTIR and HPLC methods for analysis showed almost the same results with good applicability towards commercial dosage forms. Concerning the twelve GAC principles, a detailed comparison was performed to highlight the opportunities of each technique. FTIR-PLSR analysis showed superior performance as it allows for less solvent consumption, portability, less generated waste, short operating time, less operation cost, less energy consumption, and more operator safety and it is easily coupled with chemometric tools. Besides, FTIR is a direct analytical technique that can be used for the analysis of samples in all the physical forms (solid, liquid, and gas) without modifications.

摘要

傅里叶变换红外光谱法(FTIR)是一种广泛应用的技术,它可以为固体、液体或气体样品提供化学特征(指纹图谱),具有广泛的分析应用。高效液相色谱法(HPLC)是药物分析的主要分析策略。在此,我们根据绿色分析化学(GAC)原则,对这些技术用于药物活性成分组合定量分析的潜力进行了并列比较。这些方法成功应用于酮洛芬(KTP)/东莨菪碱(HYS)和苯佐卡因(BENZ)/氢溴酸右美沙芬(DEX)二元混合物及药物制剂的分析。在FTIR分析中,基于偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)构建校准模型,KTP、HYS、DEX和BENZ的回归系数(r2)分别为0.9998、0.9994、0.9855和0.9895,线性范围宽(10 - 100、10 - 100、5 - 75和10 - 100 μg mL-1),涵盖市场样品中的浓度比。使用验证集进行外部验证,并使用留一法交叉验证计算进行内部验证,获得了较小的交叉验证均方根误差(RMSECV)值,表明模型具有良好的分辨能力。使用HPLC方法分离相同混合物也获得了相同的性能,KTP、HYS、DEX和BENZ在50 - 1000、10 - 200、5 - 100和5 - 100 μg mL-1线性范围内的r2分别等于0.9998、0.9999、0.9998和0.9998。HPLC方法按照国际协调会议(ICH)指南进行了验证,回收率良好,在98 - 100%范围内。FTIR和HPLC分析方法的统计比较显示结果几乎相同,对商业剂型具有良好的适用性。关于十二项GAC原则,进行了详细比较以突出每种技术的优势。FTIR - PLSR分析表现出卓越的性能,因为它溶剂消耗少、便于携带、产生的废物少、操作时间短、运行成本低、能源消耗少、操作人员安全性高,并且易于与化学计量工具联用。此外,FTIR是一种直接分析技术,无需改性即可用于分析所有物理形式(固体、液体和气体)的样品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验