Suppr超能文献

如何通过结构性补偿来改善无家可归者的医疗服务。对四个欧盟成员国的比较观察。

How Structural Compensation Facilitates Health Care for the Homeless. A Comparative View on Four European Union Member States.

机构信息

Center for Health and Migration, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 6;17(23):9114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239114.

Abstract

There is robust evidence that homelessness and the associated life conditions of a homeless person may cause and exacerbate a wide range of health problems, while healthcare for the homeless is simultaneously limited in accessibility, availability, and appropriateness. This article investigates legal frameworks of health care provision, existing knowledge on numbers of homeless to be considered, and current means of health care provision for four EU countries with different economic and public health background: Austria, Greece, Poland, and Romania. National experts investigated the respective regulations and practices in place with desk research. The results show differences in national frameworks of inclusion into health care provision and knowledge on the number of people experiencing homelessness, but high similarity when it comes to main actors of actual health care provision for homeless populations. In all included countries, despite their differences in economic investments and universality of access to public health systems, it is mainly NGOs providing health care to those experiencing homelessness. This phenomenon fits into conceptual frameworks developed around service provision for vulnerable population groups, wherein it has been described as "structural compensation," meaning that NGOs compensate a structural inappropriateness that can be observed within public health systems.

摘要

有确凿的证据表明,无家可归以及由此导致的无家可归者的生活条件可能会引发并加剧各种健康问题,而同时,无家可归者的医疗服务在可及性、可获得性和适宜性方面都受到限制。本文研究了医疗保健提供的法律框架、需要考虑的无家可归者人数的现有知识,以及奥地利、希腊、波兰和罗马尼亚这四个具有不同经济和公共卫生背景的欧盟国家目前为无家可归者提供医疗保健的方式。国家专家通过案头研究调查了各自的法规和现有做法。研究结果表明,各国在纳入医疗保健提供范围的框架以及对无家可归者人数的了解方面存在差异,但在为无家可归者提供实际医疗保健的主要行为者方面却非常相似。在所有被纳入的国家中,尽管在经济投资和公共卫生系统的可及性方面存在差异,但主要是非政府组织为无家可归者提供医疗保健。这种现象符合围绕弱势群体服务提供而制定的概念框架,其中将其描述为“结构性补偿”,即非政府组织补偿公共卫生系统中存在的结构性不适宜。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Austria: Health System Review.奥地利:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2018 Aug;20(3):1-254.
4
Romania: Health System Review.罗马尼亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Aug;18(4):1-170.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验