Suppr超能文献

根据1型人工角膜眼的巩膜压陷式眼压计眼压值估算Goldmann压平眼压计眼压

Estimation of Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure (IOP) from scleral Schiotz IOP values in eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses.

作者信息

Senthil Sirisha, Chary Raghava, Ali Mohammed Hasnat, Choudhari Nikhil S, Garudadri Chandra Sekhar

机构信息

Department of Glaucoma, VST Glaucoma Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Department of Glaucoma, VST Glaucoma Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr;106(4):480-484. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318121. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate estimation of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) intraocular pressure (IOP) from scleral Schiotz IOP measurements using a regression model in normal eyes and eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, cohort-1 had 253 normal anterior segment eyes, and cohort-2 had 100 eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses. Scleral Schiotz IOP measurements were used (in a non-linear model) to predict GAT IOP values for these eyes. Accuracy of predicted GAT IOP values was assessed using actual GAT IOP values for normal eyes, while for type-1 keratoprosthetic eyes, finger tension (FT) IOP assessments by an experienced glaucoma specialist were used. Primary outcome was agreement between FT IOP (assessed by an experienced glaucoma specialist) and predicted GAT IOP-derived clusters.

RESULTS

The actual values of GAT IOP measurements in normal eyes (n=253; mean age ±SD, 51.35±15.56 years) ranged between 6 mm Hg and 62 mm Hg (mean=22±10.05 mm Hg). Estimated and actual GAT IOP values for normal eyes were very similar (mean difference=0.05 mm Hg with limits of agreement: -5.39 to 5.5 by Bland-Altman plot). Of the 100 eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses, 68 were classified as having digitally normal IOP, 28 as borderline and 4 as high. The agreement between classification by FT assessment and model-predicted GAT IOP values was substantial (Kappa=0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93). The accuracy of the model in assessing IOP was found to be 91% (95% CI 0.84 to 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Scleral Schiotz IOP values along with our predictive model can be an alternative objective method to FT IOP in assessing IOP in eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses.

摘要

目的

使用回归模型,验证通过巩膜压陷式眼压计(Schiotz)测量值估算正常眼和1型人工角膜眼的Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)眼压的方法。

方法

在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,队列1有253只眼前节正常的眼睛,队列2有100只1型人工角膜眼。使用巩膜压陷式眼压计测量值(采用非线性模型)来预测这些眼睛的GAT眼压值。对于正常眼,使用实际GAT眼压值评估预测的GAT眼压值的准确性;对于1型人工角膜眼,则由经验丰富的青光眼专家进行指压眼压(FT)评估。主要结果是FT眼压(由经验丰富的青光眼专家评估)与预测的GAT眼压衍生聚类之间的一致性。

结果

正常眼(n = 253;平均年龄±标准差,51.35±15.56岁)的GAT眼压测量实际值在6 mmHg至62 mmHg之间(平均 = 22±10.05 mmHg)。正常眼的估算GAT眼压值与实际值非常相似(平均差异 = 0.05 mmHg,一致性界限:Bland-Altman图为-5.39至5.5)。在100只1型人工角膜眼中,68只被归类为指压眼压正常,28只为临界值,4只为高眼压。FT评估分类与模型预测的GAT眼压值之间的一致性很强(Kappa = 0.81,95%CI 0.69至0.93)。该模型评估眼压的准确性为91%(95%CI 0.84至0.96)。

结论

巩膜压陷式眼压计测量值与我们的预测模型可作为评估1型人工角膜眼眼压时替代指压眼压的客观方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验