Suppr超能文献

一所药学院采用改良德尔菲共识技术重新定义关键绩效指标的举措。

A key performance indicators redefinition initiative at a school of pharmacy using a modified Delphi consensus technique.

作者信息

Salgado Teresa M, Reynolds Taylor N, Frankart Laura M, Holdford David A, Dipiro Joseph T

机构信息

MPharm, PhD. Assistant Professor. Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University . Richmond, VA ( United States ).

BS. School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University . Richmond, VA ( United States ).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2120. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2120. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Outcomes and Assessment Committee at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy was tasked with refining the school's key performance indicators (KPIs) to improve programmatic assessment by focusing on the most important measures.

METHODS

Initially, 56 KPIs were tracked, nine of which were university mandated, divided into 10 modules: admissions, community outreach, continuing education, diversity, faculty experience and success, fundraising, graduate program, research and scholarship, staff experience and success, and student experience and success. Using a three-round Delphi consensus technique, KPIs were reviewed by faculty and staff. Each participant responded whether they considered each KPI to be essential or not essential for school quality assessment and improvement. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 109 faculty and staff invited, 49 participated in the first round, 51 in the second, and 42 in the third. At the end of the third round, accumulated consensus was achieved for 35 out of 88 (39.8%) KPIs that were considered essential and 3 out of 88 (3.4%) that were considered non-essential. Consensus percentage per module was: 15.4% (2/13) admissions, 28.6% (2/7) community outreach, 33.3% (3/9) continuing education, 27.3% (3/11) diversity, 62.5% (5/8) faculty experience and success, 55.6% (5/9) fundraising, 40% (4/10) graduate program, 33.3% (3/9) research and scholarship, 57.1% (4/7) staff experience and success, and 66.7% (4/6) student experience and success.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultimately, 35 KPIs achieved consensus as essential to measure achievement of benchmarks for the school, which totals 44 KPIs, including nine university mandated KPIs. The process facilitated faculty and staff involvement in KPI selection and achieved improved focus for programmatic assessment.

摘要

目的

弗吉尼亚联邦大学药学院的成果与评估委员会的任务是完善学校的关键绩效指标(KPI),通过关注最重要的指标来改进项目评估。

方法

最初,跟踪了56个关键绩效指标,其中9个是大学规定的,分为10个模块:招生、社区外展、继续教育、多样性、教师经验与成就、筹款、研究生项目、研究与奖学金、员工经验与成就以及学生经验与成就。采用三轮德尔菲共识技术,由教师和工作人员对关键绩效指标进行评审。每位参与者需回答他们是否认为每个关键绩效指标对学校质量评估和改进至关重要。第一轮、第二轮和第三轮的共识分别定义为≥90%、≥80%和≥75%的一致意见。

结果

在受邀的109名教师和工作人员中,49人参与了第一轮,51人参与了第二轮,42人参与了第三轮。在第三轮结束时,88个被认为至关重要的关键绩效指标中有35个(39.8%)达成了累积共识,88个被认为不重要的关键绩效指标中有3个(3.4%)达成了共识。每个模块的共识百分比为:招生15.4%(2/13)、社区外展28.6%(2/7)、继续教育33.3%(3/9)、多样性27.3%(3/11)、教师经验与成就62.5%(5/8)、筹款55.6%(5/9)、研究生项目40%(4/10)、研究与奖学金33.3%(3/9)、员工经验与成就57.1%(4/7)以及学生经验与成就66.7%(4/6)。

结论

最终,35个关键绩效指标达成了作为衡量学校基准成就的关键指标的共识,学校共有44个关键绩效指标,其中包括9个大学规定的关键绩效指标。该过程促进了教师和工作人员参与关键绩效指标的选择,并使项目评估的重点得到了改进。

相似文献

2
Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care.院前急救关键绩效指标的制定。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr;33(4):286-92. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204793. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Recommendations for Evaluating Practice-Related Activities of Pharmacy Faculty.评估药学教师与实践相关活动的建议。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Apr;51(4):345-353. doi: 10.1177/1060028016683496. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验