Park Seong-Jun, Park Se-Hee, Cho Kyung-Mo, Ji Hyo-Jin, Lee Eun-Hye, Kim Jin-Woo
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Oct 14;45(4):e51. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e51. eCollection 2020 Nov.
No studies have yet assessed vibration characteristics according to endodontic file length. Accordingly, the objective of the present study was to examine the vibration characteristics according to nickel-titanium file length and to compare these characteristics between different file systems.
A total of 45 root canal models were divided into 3 experimental groups ( = 15 each) based on the file system used (ProTaper Gold [PTG], ProTaper Next, or WaveOne Gold [WOG]). Each experimental group was further divided into 3 subgroups according to file length (21, 25, or 31 mm). An electric motor (X-SMART PLUS) was used in the experiment. For each file system, vibrations generated when using a size 25 file were measured and used to calculate the average vibration acceleration. The differences in vibrations were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Scheffé test with a confidence interval of 95%.
In the PTG file system, significantly lower vibration acceleration was observed when using a 21-mm file than when using a 31-mm file. In the WOG file system, significantly stronger vibration acceleration was observed when using a 31-mm file than when using 21- or 25-mm files. Regardless of the file length, the WOG group exhibited significantly stronger vibration acceleration than the other 2 experimental groups.
In clinical practice, choosing a file with the shortest length possible could help reduce vibrations. Additionally, consideration should be given to vibrations that could be generated when using WOG files with reciprocating motion.
尚无研究根据根管锉长度评估振动特性。因此,本研究的目的是检查镍钛锉长度的振动特性,并比较不同锉系统之间的这些特性。
根据所使用的锉系统(ProTaper Gold [PTG]、ProTaper Next或WaveOne Gold [WOG]),将总共45个根管模型分为3个实验组(每组n = 15)。每个实验组根据锉长度进一步分为3个亚组(21、25或31 mm)。实验中使用了一台电动马达(X-SMART PLUS)。对于每个锉系统,测量使用25号锉时产生的振动,并用于计算平均振动加速度。使用单向方差分析和置信区间为95%的Scheffé检验分析振动差异。
在PTG锉系统中,使用21 mm锉时观察到的振动加速度明显低于使用31 mm锉时。在WOG锉系统中,使用31 mm锉时观察到的振动加速度明显强于使用21或25 mm锉时。无论锉长度如何,WOG组的振动加速度均明显强于其他2个实验组。
在临床实践中,选择尽可能短的锉可能有助于减少振动。此外,应考虑使用往复运动的WOG锉时可能产生 的振动。