Lidén Moa
Faculty of Law, Uppsala University, Sweden, Department of Security and Crime Science, UCL, United Kingdom.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Nov 6;2:325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.11.001. eCollection 2020.
Since well-functioning criminal investigations and proceedings are crucial parts of a society governed by the rule of law, it is essential to understand whether and how they are impacted by the current COVID-19 pandemic. The Swedish context provides an interesting case study and comparison to developments in other countries which have introduced more far-reaching interventions such as lockdowns. In this study, Swedish practitioners (N =10), including police officers, forensic pathologists, prosecutors, defense counsels and judges, participated in an online survey in which they gave their views on the pandemic's impact on their work situations. The overall results show that the major impact was on their work methods, with transitions to using more online methods and increased remote working, while the smallest impact was noted in relation to work character, including crime and evidence types which have remained relatively constant. Forensic pathologists reported the largest impact on work quality, although there was large individual variation in their responses. On a general level, the practitioners perceived that the measures undertaken at their work places were relatively sufficient and also perceived of the risk of contracting or spreading the virus as relatively low but also this was associated with large individual variation. Given the small sample of practitioners and that practitioners' responses relate to an early stage of what is presumed to be a prolonged pandemic, replication as well as caution in interpreting the results are needed.
由于运作良好的刑事调查和诉讼程序是法治社会的关键组成部分,因此了解它们是否以及如何受到当前新冠疫情的影响至关重要。瑞典的情况提供了一个有趣的案例研究,并可与其他实施了诸如封锁等更广泛干预措施的国家的发展情况进行比较。在本研究中,包括警察、法医病理学家、检察官、辩护律师和法官在内的瑞典从业者(N = 10)参与了一项在线调查,他们在调查中就疫情对其工作状况的影响发表了看法。总体结果表明,主要影响在于他们的工作方法,转向使用更多在线方法并增加了远程工作,而对工作性质的影响最小,包括犯罪和证据类型相对保持不变。法医病理学家报告称对工作质量的影响最大,尽管他们的回答存在很大的个体差异。总体而言,从业者认为其工作场所采取的措施相对充分,也认为感染或传播病毒的风险相对较低,但这也存在很大的个体差异。鉴于从业者样本较小,且从业者的回答与被认为是长期疫情的早期阶段相关,因此需要重复研究并谨慎解读结果。