• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期子宫切除术中单剂与 24 小时多次剂量抗生素预防的比较研究。

A comparative study between a single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Nov 30;14(11):1306-1313. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13034.

DOI:10.3855/jidc.13034
PMID:33296344
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major health issue in surgical specialties in terms of health care costs and patients' clinical outcomes. At the level of the patient, prolonged hospital stays or readmissions for SSIs, can affect the patient's quality of life. At the level of the health care system, it exhausts the hospital's resources and increases the burden on the medical staff due to the need for continuous wound care, microbiological cultures, laboratory tests and medications. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for the prevention of SSIs in patients undergoing elective hysterectomy surgeries.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort, analyzing 141 patients, was conducted between November 2016 and January 2019 at a university hospital. We compared the efficacy of a single dose vs. 24-hour multiple doses of Cefazolin in patients who underwent elective hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications. The secondary objective was to identify potential risk factors associated with SSIs.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between both groups (p = 0.872). Obesity and a laparotomy surgical approach are risk factors to the development of SSIs (p = 0.001 and 0.014, respectively). Other potential risk factors include the duration of hospital stay, the duration of the surgery and the amount of blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the rate of SSIs is not significantly different between both groups, risk stratification can be done after screening patients and the prophylactic regimen must be tailored for each patient in a cost-effective manner and using a multidisciplinary approach.

摘要

简介

在医疗成本和患者临床结果方面,手术部位感染(SSI)是外科专业的一个主要健康问题。就患者而言,因 SSI 而延长住院时间或再次入院,会影响患者的生活质量。就医疗保健系统而言,它会耗尽医院的资源,并由于需要持续的伤口护理、微生物培养、实验室检查和药物治疗而增加医务人员的负担。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种抗生素预防方案在预防择期子宫切除术患者 SSI 中的有效性。

方法

回顾性队列分析,共纳入 141 例患者,于 2016 年 11 月至 2019 年 1 月在一所大学医院进行。我们比较了头孢唑林单次剂量与 24 小时多次剂量在因良性或恶性指征行择期子宫切除术的患者中的疗效。次要目的是确定与 SSI 相关的潜在危险因素。

结果

两组之间无统计学差异(p = 0.872)。肥胖和剖腹手术入路是 SSI 发展的危险因素(p = 0.001 和 0.014)。其他潜在的危险因素包括住院时间、手术持续时间和失血量。

结论

尽管两组 SSI 发生率无显著差异,但可以在筛选患者后进行风险分层,并且必须以经济有效的方式并采用多学科方法为每位患者量身定制预防方案。

相似文献

1
A comparative study between a single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy.择期子宫切除术中单剂与 24 小时多次剂量抗生素预防的比较研究。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Nov 30;14(11):1306-1313. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13034.
2
Metronidazole and cefazolin vs cefazolin alone for surgical site infection prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.甲硝唑和头孢唑林与单独使用头孢唑林预防综合性癌症中心妇科手术部位感染的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;231(3):326.e1-326.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.043. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Impact of Intraoperative Continuous-Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of Cefazolin Therapy on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术后头孢唑林术中持续输注与间歇给药疗法对手术部位感染发生率的影响
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):166-73. doi: 10.1002/phar.1689. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
The Impact of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Standard Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion.万古霉素和头孢唑林作为标准术前抗生素预防用药对脊柱内固定术后手术部位感染的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):E366-E371. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002839.
5
Prospective randomized comparison of single-dose versus 1-day cefazolin for prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery.单剂量与一日量头孢唑林在妇科手术预防应用中的前瞻性随机对照研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):384-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00583.x.
6
[Dosage of presurgical cefazolin in obese and non-obese patients. Does weight matter?].[肥胖与非肥胖患者术前头孢唑林的剂量。体重有影响吗?]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Jun;33(3):207-211. doi: 10.37201/req/026.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Wound infection following implant removal of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella; a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin compared to placebo (WIFI-2 trial).足部、踝部、小腿或髌骨植入物取出术后的伤口感染;一项多中心随机对照试验的方案,旨在研究 2g 头孢唑林预防性治疗与安慰剂相比的(成本)效益(WIFI-2 试验)。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01024-y.
8
Comparison of 2g vs 1 g of Prophylactic Cefazolin in Surgical Site Infections in Trauma Surgery Below the Knee.比较 2g 与 1g 头孢唑林预防性用药在创伤膝关节以下手术部位感染中的效果。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 May;41(5):582-589. doi: 10.1177/1071100720903723. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Prevention of Infections in Cardiac Surgery study (PICS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized factorial crossover pilot trial.心脏手术感染预防研究(PICS):一项实用的整群随机析因交叉试点试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Dec 17;19(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3080-y.
10
Effect of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infections complicating cardiac surgery.术前抗生素预防对心脏手术并发手术部位感染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):69-74. doi: 10.1086/674386. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Single-Dose and Multiple-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Preventing Surgical Site Infections.单剂量与多剂量抗生素预防手术部位感染的对比分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1188-S1190. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1573_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.用于预防手术部位感染的抗生素:单剂量与多剂量
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Dec;31(12):101800. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101800. Epub 2023 Sep 26.