Department of Anesthesia, Hollywood Private Hospital, Monash Avenue, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; Department of Anesthesia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
The Joint Studio, Orthopedic Surgery, Hollywood Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
J Clin Anesth. 2021 May;69:110153. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110153. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
The erector spinae plane block is an emerging analgesic technique, which is gaining popularity for a large number of procedures. The majority of publications are at the thoracic level and almost all indicate some benefit to patients. However, there have been relatively few randomized controlled trials and even fewer studies at the lumbar level. The aim of this study was to assess whether the erector spinae plane block at the lumbar level would confer early analgesic benefits and improve the quality of recovery in patients undergoing elective unilateral primary hip arthroplasty. Sixty-four patients were randomized to receive an erector spinae plane block at the third lumbar vertebra with either 30milliliters (ml) of 0.2% ropivacaine or 30 ml of 0.9% saline. The patient, anesthetist and assessor were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome was pain on movement at 6 h (numeric rating scale 0-10) with a reduction of 2 points considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery (QoR-15 score), mobilization and length of stay. In this study there was no appreciable analgesic benefit to adding an erector spinae plane block to patients who already receive neuraxial blocks, local anesthetic infiltration and oral multimodal analgesia for elective primary total hip arthroplasty. Both groups were found to have relatively low pain scores and a high quality of recovery with no significant difference in mobilization or length of stay.
竖脊肌平面阻滞是一种新兴的镇痛技术,由于其在大量手术中的应用而越来越受欢迎。大多数出版物都集中在胸段,几乎都表明对患者有一定益处。然而,随机对照试验相对较少,腰段的研究更少。本研究旨在评估腰段竖脊肌平面阻滞是否会给接受择期单侧初次全髋关节置换术的患者带来早期镇痛益处,并改善恢复质量。64 名患者随机分为三组,每组 30 毫升 0.2%罗哌卡因或 30 毫升 0.9%生理盐水。患者、麻醉师和评估者均对分组情况不知情。主要结局是 6 小时时的运动时疼痛(数字评分量表 0-10,降低 2 分被认为具有临床意义)。次要结局包括恢复质量(QoR-15 评分)、活动度和住院时间。在这项研究中,对于已经接受椎管内阻滞、局部麻醉浸润和口服多模式镇痛的择期初次全髋关节置换术患者,添加竖脊肌平面阻滞并没有明显的镇痛益处。两组患者的疼痛评分均较低,恢复质量较高,活动度和住院时间无显著差异。