Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA -
J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Jun;65(3):322-326. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.05207-8. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
Carotid endarterectomy is considered the gold standard for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The role of CEA has been defined by multiple randomized multicenter trials and CEA is the most studied surgical procedure. In recent years, with advances in endovascular techniques, carotid angioplasty, and stenting (CAS) has been proposed as an alternative to CEA especially in high-risk patients. In this article, we review some of the most important trials on the invasive treatment of carotid artery stenosis and summarized the most recent treatment recommendations based on current evidence. The data overwhelmingly supports revascularization of patients with symptomatic stenosis between 70-90%, with a clear preference for CEA over CAS to be done within 14 days of symptom onset is possible. However, CAS is an acceptable alternative to CEA in certain symptomatic patients such as those with severe medical comorbidities, high riding plaques, contralateral occlusion, restenosis after prior CEA, and radiation-induced stenosis. Treatment of asymptomatic patients remains controversial because of advanced of modern medical therapy and large trials are underway to define the role of invasive revascularization in these patients.
颈动脉内膜切除术被认为是无症状和有症状颈动脉狭窄患者一级和二级预防中风的金标准。多项随机多中心试验明确了 CEA 的作用,CEA 是研究最多的手术。近年来,随着血管内技术的进步,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)已被提议作为 CEA 的替代方法,尤其是在高危患者中。本文回顾了一些关于颈动脉狭窄侵袭性治疗的最重要试验,并根据现有证据总结了最新的治疗建议。数据压倒性地支持对有症状狭窄程度在 70-90%之间的患者进行血运重建,对于在症状发作后 14 天内进行血运重建,CEA 明显优于 CAS。然而,对于某些有症状的患者,如严重的合并症、高位斑块、对侧闭塞、CEA 后再狭窄和放射性狭窄,CAS 是 CEA 的可接受替代方法。由于现代医学治疗的进步,对无症状患者的治疗仍存在争议,并且正在进行大型试验以确定在这些患者中侵袭性血运重建的作用。