Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; and.
Division of Pharmacy Practice, Duquesne University School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 1;77(3):343-348. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000966.
Despite sacubitril/valsartan being on the market since 2015, clinicians are still determining the best way to initiate therapy to optimize outcomes and minimize potential for side effects. The purpose of this study is to investigate real-world outpatient experience of prescribing sacubitril/valsartan therapy based on appropriate patient selection, dosing conversion, and tolerability. This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients' prescribed sacubitril/valsartan therapy in cardiology clinics associated with an academic institution between February 1, 2016, and August 30, 2018. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, enrolled in a clinical trial involving sacubitril/valsartan, or had insufficient data. The primary outcome was to determine how many heart failure patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan were performed so appropriately based on guideline and package insert recommendations. Select secondary outcomes included rates of adverse events and need for adjustment of concomitant heart failure medications. A total of 250 patients were included in this study. For the primary outcome, 125 patients (50%) were appropriately initiated on sacubitril/valsartan. Those who were inappropriately initiated on the medication experienced more symptoms of hypotension (16% in the appropriate start group vs. 28% in the inappropriate start group; P = 0.022) and required more dose decreases of sacubitril/valsartan (6% in the appropriate start group vs. 13% in the inappropriate start group; P = 0.049). In outpatient clinical practice, almost half of patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan were performed so outside of guideline recommendations, which was associated with an increased risk of hypotension and dose reductions.
尽管沙库巴曲缬沙坦自 2015 年上市以来,临床医生仍在确定最佳的治疗启动方式,以优化疗效并最小化潜在的副作用。本研究旨在调查根据适当的患者选择、剂量转换和耐受性,在门诊环境下开具沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的真实世界经验。本回顾性队列研究评估了 2016 年 2 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 30 日期间,在与学术机构相关联的心脏病学诊所中,患者开具的沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗方案。如果患者年龄小于 18 岁、参加了涉及沙库巴曲缬沙坦的临床试验或数据不足,则将其排除在外。主要结局是确定根据指南和说明书建议,有多少心力衰竭患者接受了沙库巴曲缬沙坦的适当起始治疗。选择的次要结局包括不良事件的发生率和需要调整心力衰竭合并用药的情况。本研究共纳入 250 例患者。在主要结局方面,有 125 例(50%)患者接受了沙库巴曲缬沙坦的适当起始治疗。在起始治疗不当的患者中,低血压症状更多(适当起始组为 16%,不当起始组为 28%;P = 0.022),需要更多的沙库巴曲缬沙坦剂量减少(适当起始组为 6%,不当起始组为 13%;P = 0.049)。在门诊临床实践中,近一半接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦起始治疗的患者不符合指南建议,这与低血压和剂量减少的风险增加有关。