Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute.
Joint Program in Cancer Biology, Brown University and Lifespan Health System, Providence, RI.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;44(2):68-73. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000785.
First-line regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) combine a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/XELOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI). There is limited efficacy data to guide the selection of one treatment over the other. This study investigated whether mutations affecting DNA damage response (DDR) could differentially influence the response to oxaliplatin and irinotecan-containing regimens.
We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with mCRC for whom treatment outcomes and results of comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors were available. Specimens with at least 1 pathogenic mutation involving BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, or RAD54L were classified as DDR-mutated, while those without mutations were DDR-wild-type (WT). We compared the overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and response rate (RR) between the DDR-mutated and DDR-WT groups.
DDR mutations occurred in 11 patients (22%). First-line treatment with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen was administered to 33 patients (31 FOLFOX, 2 XELOX), while 16 patients received FOLFIRI. Among DDR-mutated cases, first-line treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with a statistically significant improvement in median OS compared with FOLFIRI (3.4 vs.1.8 y; P=0.042) and numerically higher RR (50% vs. 33%; P=0.58). No significant difference in OS (2.4 vs. 2.5 y; P=0.42), RR, disease control rate was observed between the 2 regimens in patients with DDR-WT tumors.
Mutations in DDR genes were present in 22% of patients with mCRC. In patients with DDR-mutated tumors, initial treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with improved OS and a numerically higher RR compared with FOLFIRI.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线治疗方案包括氟嘧啶联合奥沙利铂(FOLFOX/XELOX)或伊立替康(FOLFIRI)。目前,仅有有限的疗效数据可用于指导这两种治疗方案的选择。本研究旨在探讨是否存在影响 DNA 损伤反应(DDR)的突变会对含奥沙利铂和伊立替康的治疗方案的反应产生不同的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 49 例 mCRC 患者,这些患者的治疗结果和肿瘤的全面基因组分析结果均可用。至少存在 1 种涉及 BRCA1、BRCA2、ATM、BARD1、BRIP1、CDK12、CHEK1、CHEK2、FANCL、PALB2、PPP2R2A、RAD51B、RAD51C、RAD51D 或 RAD54L 的致病性突变的标本被归类为 DDR 突变型,而无突变的标本则归类为 DDR 野生型(WT)。我们比较了 DDR 突变组和 DDR-WT 组之间的总生存期(OS)、疾病控制率和缓解率(RR)。
11 例(22%)患者存在 DDR 突变。33 例患者(31 例 FOLFOX,2 例 XELOX)接受了含奥沙利铂的一线治疗,而 16 例患者接受了 FOLFIRI 治疗。在 DDR 突变病例中,与 FOLFIRI 相比,FOLFOX/XELOX 的一线治疗与中位 OS 的显著改善相关(3.4 与 1.8 年;P=0.042),且 RR 更高(50%与 33%;P=0.58)。在 DDR-WT 肿瘤患者中,两种方案之间的 OS(2.4 与 2.5 年;P=0.42)、RR 和疾病控制率均无显著差异。
mCRC 患者中存在 22%的 DDR 基因突变。在存在 DDR 突变的肿瘤患者中,与 FOLFIRI 相比,FOLFOX/XELOX 的初始治疗与 OS 的改善和 RR 的升高相关。