Lanier Steven T, Hill J Ryan, James Aimee S, Rolf Liz, Brogan David M, Dy Christopher J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Services, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Nov 24;8(11):e3267. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003267. eCollection 2020 Nov.
Treatment of pan-brachial plexus injuries has evolved significantly over the past 2 decades, with refinement and introduction of new surgical techniques, particularly free functional muscle transfer. The extent to which contemporary brachial plexus surgeons utilize various techniques as part of their treatment algorithm for pan-plexus injuries and the rationale underlying these choices remain largely unknown.
A case scenario was posed to 12 brachial plexus surgeons during semi-structured qualitative interviews. The case involved a young patient presenting 6 weeks after a pan-plexus injury from a motorcycle accident. Surgeons were asked to formulate a treatment plan. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify commonalities and variation in approach to treatment.
For shoulder function, the majority of surgeons would graft from a viable C5 nerve root, if possible, though the chosen target varied. Two-thirds of the surgeons would address elbow flexion with nerve transfers, though half would combine this with a free functional muscle transfer to increase elbow flexion strength. Free functional muscle transfer was the technique of choice to restore finger flexion. Finger extension, intrinsic function, and sensation were not prioritized.
Our study sheds light on current trends in the approach to pan-plexus injuries in the U.S. and identifies areas of variability that would benefit from future study. The optimal shoulder target and the role for grafting to the MCN for elbow flexion merit further investigation. The role of FFMT plays an increasingly prominent role in treatment algorithms.
在过去20年中,全臂丛神经损伤的治疗有了显著进展,出现了新的手术技术并不断完善,尤其是游离功能性肌肉移植。目前臂丛神经外科医生在全臂丛神经损伤治疗方案中运用各种技术的程度以及这些选择背后的基本原理在很大程度上仍不为人知。
在半结构化定性访谈中向12位臂丛神经外科医生提出了一个病例场景。该病例涉及一名年轻患者,在摩托车事故导致全臂丛神经损伤6周后前来就诊。要求外科医生制定治疗方案。采用归纳主题分析法来确定治疗方法的共性和差异。
对于肩部功能,大多数外科医生会尽可能从存活的C5神经根进行移植,尽管所选靶点各不相同。三分之二的外科医生会通过神经移植来解决肘部屈曲问题,不过有一半医生会将其与游离功能性肌肉移植相结合以增强肘部屈曲力量。游离功能性肌肉移植是恢复手指屈曲的首选技术。手指伸展、内在肌功能和感觉未被列为优先考虑因素。
我们的研究揭示了美国目前全臂丛神经损伤治疗方法的趋势,并确定了一些可变因素,这些因素将受益于未来的研究。最佳肩部靶点以及将移植到肌皮神经以解决肘部屈曲的作用值得进一步研究。游离功能性肌肉移植在治疗方案中发挥着越来越重要的作用。