• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植物DNA条形码的原理与局限:以香荚兰属为例的研究

Plant DNA Barcoding Principles and Limits: A Case Study in the Genus Vanilla.

作者信息

Besse Pascale, Da Silva Denis, Grisoni Michel

机构信息

UMR PVBMT, Universite de la Reunion, St Pierre, Réunion, France.

Université de La Réunion, UMR PVBMT, St Pierre, La Réunion, France.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2222:131-148. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_8.

DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_8
PMID:33301092
Abstract

Powerful DNA barcodes have been much more difficult to define in plants than in animals. In 2009, the international Consortium for the Barcoding Of Life (CBOL) chose the combination of the chloroplast genes (rbcL + matK) as the proposed official barcode for plants. However, this system has got important limits. First, any barcode system will only be useful if there is a clear barcode gap and if species are monophyletic. Second, chloroplast and mitochondrial (COI gene used for animals) barcodes will not be usable for discriminating hybrid species. Moreover, it was also shown that, using chloroplast regions, maximum species discrimination would be around 70% and very variable among plant groups. This is why many authors have more recently advocated for the addition of the nuclear ITS region to this barcode because it reveals more variations and allows the resolution of hybrid or closely related species. We tested different chloroplast genes (rbcL, matK, psaB, psbC) and the nuclear ITS region in the genus Vanilla, a taxonomically complex group and therefore a good model to test for the efficiency of different barcode systems. We found that the CBOL official barcode system performed relatively poorly in Vanilla (76% species discrimination), and we demonstrate that adding ITS to this barcode system allows to increase resolution (for closely related species and to the subspecies level) and to identify hybrid species. The best species discrimination attained was 96.2% because of one paraphyletic species that could not be resolved.

摘要

在植物中定义强大的DNA条形码比在动物中要困难得多。2009年,国际生命条形码联盟(CBOL)选择叶绿体基因组合(rbcL + matK)作为植物的官方条形码提议。然而,该系统存在重要局限性。首先,任何条形码系统只有在存在明显的条形码间隙且物种是单系的情况下才有用。其次,叶绿体和线粒体(用于动物的COI基因)条形码无法用于区分杂交物种。此外,研究还表明,使用叶绿体区域,最大物种区分率约为70%,且在不同植物类群中差异很大。这就是为什么最近许多作者主张在该条形码中添加核ITS区域,因为它能揭示更多变异,并有助于区分杂交或近缘物种。我们在香草属中测试了不同的叶绿体基因(rbcL、matK、psaB、psbC)和核ITS区域,香草属在分类学上较为复杂,因此是测试不同条形码系统效率的良好模型。我们发现CBOL官方条形码系统在香草属中的表现相对较差(物种区分率为76%),并且我们证明在该条形码系统中添加ITS可以提高分辨率(区分近缘物种和亚种水平)并识别杂交物种。由于一个并系物种无法区分,获得的最佳物种区分率为96.2%。

相似文献

1
Plant DNA Barcoding Principles and Limits: A Case Study in the Genus Vanilla.植物DNA条形码的原理与局限:以香荚兰属为例的研究
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2222:131-148. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_8.
2
Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes.利用DNA条形码鉴定被子植物伞形科中的物种。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Nov;14(6):1231-8. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12262. Epub 2014 May 14.
3
Forensic botany II, DNA barcode for land plants: Which markers after the international agreement?法医植物学II,陆地植物的DNA条形码:国际协议之后采用哪些标记?
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Mar;15:131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.对来自中国西部的杨属植物进行条形码标记。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071710. eCollection 2013.
5
DNA barcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (Taxus L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species.DNA 条形码技术在鉴别欧亚紫杉(红豆杉属,红豆杉科)和发现隐存种中的应用。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02907.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
6
Testing the Efficacy of DNA Barcodes for Identifying the Vascular Plants of Canada.测试DNA条形码在鉴定加拿大维管植物方面的功效。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 10;12(1):e0169515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169515. eCollection 2017.
7
Barcoding success as a function of phylogenetic relatedness in Viburnum, a clade of woody angiosperms.条形码技术在木质被子植物的 Viburnum 属中的系统发育相关性分析中的应用。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 May 30;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-73.
8
DNA barcodes for delineating Clerodendrum species of North East India.用于划分印度东北部 clerodendrum 物种的 DNA 条码。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 10;10(1):13490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70405-3.
9
Evolutionary histories determine DNA barcoding success in vascular plants: seven case studies using intraspecific broad sampling of closely related species.进化历史决定维管植物DNA条形码的成功率:七个使用密切相关物种种内广泛采样的案例研究
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 May 13;16:103. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0678-0.
10
The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species.根据植物区系研究推荐作为植物通用条形码的位点,可能不适用于同属物种,如石斛属物种的DNA条形码所示。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jan 19;5:42. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-tiered authentication of herbal traditional Chinese medicine ingredients used in women's health provides progressive qualitative and quantitative insight.用于女性健康的中药成分的三层认证提供了渐进式的定性和定量见解。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1353434. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1353434. eCollection 2024.
2
Multi-omics approaches for in-depth understanding of therapeutic mechanism for Traditional Chinese Medicine.用于深入理解中药治疗机制的多组学方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1031051. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031051. eCollection 2022.
3
Screening of universal DNA barcodes for identifying grass species of Gramineae.

本文引用的文献

1
ITS1: a DNA barcode better than ITS2 in eukaryotes?ITS1:真核生物中比 ITS2 更好的 DNA 条码?
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 May;15(3):573-86. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12325. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
2
BOLDMirror: a global mirror system of DNA barcode data.BOLDMirror:一个 DNA 条码数据的全球镜像系统。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Nov;13(6):991-5. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12048. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
3
The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding.DNA 条形码的七大原罪。
用于鉴定禾本科草种的通用DNA条形码筛选
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 7;13:998863. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.998863. eCollection 2022.
4
The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification of plants.基于叶绿体基因的用于植物物种鉴定的特定DNA条形码。
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2022 Apr;28(4):837-848. doi: 10.1007/s12298-022-01175-7. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Challenges in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants DNA Barcoding-Lessons from the Lamiaceae.药用和芳香植物DNA条形码技术面临的挑战——唇形科的经验教训
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;11(1):137. doi: 10.3390/plants11010137.
6
Molecular Approaches to Agri-Food Traceability and Authentication: An Updated Review.农业食品可追溯性与认证的分子方法:最新综述
Foods. 2021 Jul 16;10(7):1644. doi: 10.3390/foods10071644.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Nov;13(6):969-75. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12046. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
4
Refining the DNA barcode for land plants.完善陆生植物的DNA条形码
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19451-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116812108. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
5
Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants.大量数据集的比较分析表明,内转录间隔区(ITS)应该被纳入种子植物的核心条形码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19641-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104551108. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
6
Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode.选择和使用植物 DNA 条形码。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019254. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers?利用 DNA 条形码标记物鉴别植物物种是否比鉴别动物物种固有地更困难?
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:130-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02652.x.
8
Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals.利用 ITS2 区作为动植物通用 DNA 条形码。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 1;5(10):e13102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102.
9
Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species.ITS2 区作为鉴定药用植物物种的新型 DNA 条形码的验证。
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 7;5(1):e8613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613.
10
Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species.动物生命条形码:近缘物种间细胞色素c氧化酶亚基1的差异
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S96-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025.