• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新调整终末期肝脏疾病模型以适应欧洲肝移植区域。

Refitting the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease for the Eurotransplant Region.

机构信息

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):351-363. doi: 10.1002/hep.31677. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1002/hep.31677
PMID:33301607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8359978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The United Network for Organ Sharing's Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (UNOS-MELD) score is the basis of liver allocation in the Eurotransplant region. It was constructed 20 years ago in a small US cohort and has remained unchanged ever since. The best boundaries and coefficients were never calculated for any region outside the United States. Therefore, this study refits the MELD (reMELD) for the Eurotransplant region.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

All adult patients listed for a first liver transplantation between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2018, were included. Data were randomly split in a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). In the training data, generalized additive models with splines were plotted for each MELD parameter. The lower and upper bound combinations with the maximum log-likelihood were chosen for the final models. The refit models were tested in the validation data with C-indices and Brier scores. Through likelihood ratio tests the refit models were compared to UNOS-MELD. The correlation between scores and survival of prioritized patients was calculated. A total of 6,684 patients were included. Based on training data, refit parameters were capped at creatinine 0.7-2.5, bilirubin 0.3-27, international normalized ratio 0.1-2.6, and sodium 120-139. ReMELD and reMELD-Na showed C-indices of 0.866 and 0.869, respectively. ReMELD-Na prioritized patients with 1.6 times higher 90-day mortality probabilities compared to UNOS-MELD.

CONCLUSIONS

Refitting MELD resulted in new lower and upper bounds for each parameter. The predictive power of reMELD-Na was significantly higher than UNOS-MELD. ReMELD prioritized patients with higher 90-day mortality rates. Thus, reMELD(-Na) should replace UNOS-MELD for liver graft allocation in the Eurotransplant region.

摘要

背景与目的

美国器官共享联合网络的终末期肝病模型(UNOS-MELD)评分是欧洲肝移植区域肝脏分配的基础。该评分于 20 年前在美国的一个小队列中构建,此后一直没有改变。在美国以外的任何地区,最佳边界和系数从未被计算过。因此,本研究对欧洲肝移植区域的 MELD(reMELD)进行了重新拟合。

方法和结果

纳入 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间接受首次肝移植的所有成年患者。数据随机分为训练集(70%)和验证集(30%)。在训练数据中,对每个 MELD 参数绘制了带有样条的广义加性模型。选择最大对数似然的下限和上限组合作为最终模型。在验证数据中使用 C 指数和 Brier 评分对重新拟合的模型进行测试。通过似然比检验将重新拟合的模型与 UNOS-MELD 进行比较。计算优先患者的评分与生存之间的相关性。共纳入 6684 例患者。基于训练数据,重新拟合的参数被限制在肌酐 0.7-2.5、胆红素 0.3-27、国际标准化比值 0.1-2.6 和钠 120-139。ReMELD 和 reMELD-Na 的 C 指数分别为 0.866 和 0.869。与 UNOS-MELD 相比,ReMELD-Na 优先考虑的患者 90 天死亡率高 1.6 倍。

结论

重新拟合 MELD 导致每个参数的新下限和上限。reMELD-Na 的预测能力明显高于 UNOS-MELD。ReMELD 优先考虑 90 天死亡率较高的患者。因此,reMELD(-Na)应取代 UNOS-MELD 用于欧洲肝移植区域的肝移植分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/6a84178ef9a1/HEP-74-351-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/fc552988b735/HEP-74-351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/f21721ee5a56/HEP-74-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/56572e01991d/HEP-74-351-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/6a84178ef9a1/HEP-74-351-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/fc552988b735/HEP-74-351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/f21721ee5a56/HEP-74-351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/56572e01991d/HEP-74-351-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb23/8359978/6a84178ef9a1/HEP-74-351-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Refitting the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease for the Eurotransplant Region.重新调整终末期肝脏疾病模型以适应欧洲肝移植区域。
Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):351-363. doi: 10.1002/hep.31677. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
Revising model for end-stage liver disease from calendar-time cross-sections with correction for selection bias.校正选择偏倚的时间序列横截面模型修订终末期肝病模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02176-8.
3
A revised model for end-stage liver disease optimizes prediction of mortality among patients awaiting liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型修订版优化了肝移植等待患者死亡率的预测。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1952-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
4
Should All Status 1A Patients Be Prioritized Over High MELD Patients? Concept of Risk Stratification in Extremely Ill Liver Transplant Recipients.所有状态 1A 患者都应优先于高 MELD 患者吗?极危重肝移植受者的风险分层概念。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2121-2129. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002651.
5
MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.MELD 3.0:适应新时代的终末期肝病模型。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Center-related Bias in MELD Scores Within a Liver Transplant UNOS Region: A Call for Standardization.MELD 评分在肝移植 UNOS 区域内与中心相关的偏倚:呼吁标准化。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1396-1402. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003031.
7
Validation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) score in the Eurotransplant region.验证终末期肝病模型钠(MELD-Na)评分在 Eurotransplant 地区的适用性。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):229-240. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16142. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Wait-list mortality of young patients with Biliary atresia: Competing risk analysis of a eurotransplant registry-based cohort.胆道闭锁年轻患者的候补名单死亡率:基于欧洲器官移植登记处队列的竞争风险分析。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Jun;24(6):810-819. doi: 10.1002/lt.25025.
9
Disparities in Eurotransplant liver transplantation wait-list outcome between patients with and without model for end-stage liver disease exceptions.终末期肝病模型例外与无例外患者在 Eurotransplant 肝移植等待名单结果方面的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Oct;23(10):1256-1265. doi: 10.1002/lt.24805.
10
Moderate ascites identifies patients with low model for end-stage liver disease scores awaiting liver transplantation who have a high mortality risk.中等量腹水可识别出等待肝移植的低终末期肝病模型评分患者,此类患者具有较高的死亡风险。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Feb;17(2):129-36. doi: 10.1002/lt.22218.

引用本文的文献

1
PERFORMANCE OF SIX PREDICTIVE MODELS OF DEATH OF PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED FOR DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS: A MULTICENTER STUDY.失代偿期肝硬化住院患者六种死亡预测模型的性能:一项多中心研究
Arq Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 4;62:e24065. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-065. eCollection 2025.
2
Correlations of three scoring systems with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with sepsis syndrome.三种评分系统与肝硬化合并脓毒症综合征患者预后的相关性
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):99570. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.99570.
3
Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) score in the Eurotransplant region.验证终末期肝病模型钠(MELD-Na)评分在 Eurotransplant 地区的适用性。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):229-240. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16142. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Applying Machine Learning in Liver Disease and Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review.应用机器学习于肝脏疾病和移植:全面综述。
Hepatology. 2020 Mar;71(3):1093-1105. doi: 10.1002/hep.31103. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Center-related Bias in MELD Scores Within a Liver Transplant UNOS Region: A Call for Standardization.
联合器官移植治疗晚期肝病患者。
Semin Liver Dis. 2024 Aug;44(3):369-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788674. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Revising model for end-stage liver disease from calendar-time cross-sections with correction for selection bias.校正选择偏倚的时间序列横截面模型修订终末期肝病模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02176-8.
5
A Novel Score Based on Controlled Attenuation Parameter Accurately Predicts Hepatic Steatosis in Individuals With Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Derivation and Independent Validation Study.一种基于受控衰减参数的新型评分可准确预测代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病患者的肝脂肪变:一项推导和独立验证研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;15(3):e00680. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000680.
6
"Beyond MELD" - Emerging strategies and technologies for improving mortality prediction, organ allocation and outcomes in liver transplantation.“超越 MELD”-改善肝移植死亡率预测、器官分配和结局的新兴策略和技术。
J Hepatol. 2022 Jun;76(6):1318-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.003.
7
A novel radiomics signature based on T2-weighted imaging accurately predicts hepatic inflammation in individuals with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a derivation and independent validation study.基于T2加权成像的新型放射组学特征可准确预测经活检证实的非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的肝脏炎症:一项推导和独立验证研究。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022 Apr;11(2):212-226. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-23.
8
Development and validation of a dynamic survival prediction model for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.急性慢性肝衰竭患者动态生存预测模型的开发与验证
JHEP Rep. 2021 Sep 29;3(6):100369. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100369. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Joint modeling of liver transplant candidates outperforms the model for end-stage liver disease: The effect of disease development over time on patient outcome.联合建模优于终末期肝病模型在肝移植候选者中的应用:疾病随时间发展对患者预后的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3583-3592. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16730. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
MELD 评分在肝移植 UNOS 区域内与中心相关的偏倚:呼吁标准化。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1396-1402. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003031.
4
The decreasing predictive power of MELD in an era of changing etiology of liver disease.在肝病病因不断变化的时代,MELD 的预测能力下降。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Dec;19(12):3299-3307. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15559. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes.基于终末期肝病模型-钠评分分配肝脏用于移植对患者结局的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1451-1462.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Adult Liver Allocation in Eurotransplant.欧洲肝移植中的成人肝脏分配。
Transplantation. 2017 Jul;101(7):1542-1550. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001631.
8
Kidney Failure and Liver Allocation: Current Practices and Potential Improvements.肾衰竭与肝脏分配:当前实践与潜在改进
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015 Sep;22(5):391-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.05.002.
9
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698.
10
Evidence-based development of liver allocation: a review.基于证据的肝脏分配制定:综述。
Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):965-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01274.x. Epub 2011 May 25.