Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, National University Heart Centre, Singapore; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):970-980. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.117. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Although several studies revealed that the Cor-knot automated fastener (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, the influence of the device on postoperative morbidity and mortality still needs to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the use of the Cor-knot device for heart valve surgery reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and this time saving translates into reduced morbidity and mortality.
Retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of the automated fastener vs hand-tied knots were reviewed. The following end points were compared: aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, postoperative valvular regurgitation, postoperative ejection fraction, prolonged ventilator support, renal failure, and mortality.
Eight studies reporting data on 942 patients were included in the final analysis. The Cor-knot device was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (mean difference [MD], -11.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14.54 to -8.93; P < .00001) and aortic cross-clamp times (MD, -14.36; 95% CI, -19.63 to -9.09; P < .00001) in minimally invasive heart valve procedures. Overall, lower rates of postoperative valvular regurgitation (risk ratio [RR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.62; P < .0001) and prolonged ventilator support (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; P = .003) were observed. No difference was observed in postoperative atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, renal failure, and mortality.
The use of the Cor-knot device in heart valve surgery reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Furthermore, as compared with hand-tie methods, the automated fastener may lead to decreased rates of prolonged ventilator support and valvular regurgitation while being noninferior in terms of other postoperative outcomes and mortality.
尽管有几项研究表明 Cor-knot 自动紧固件(LSI Solutions,Victor,NY)可减少主动脉阻断和体外循环时间,但仍需要评估该装置对术后发病率和死亡率的影响。本研究旨在验证以下假设,即心脏瓣膜手术中使用 Cor-knot 装置可减少主动脉阻断和体外循环时间,并且这种时间节省可转化为降低发病率和死亡率。
回顾性队列研究和比较自动紧固件与手工打结的随机对照试验报告。比较了以下终点:主动脉阻断和体外循环时间、术后瓣膜反流、术后射血分数、延长呼吸机支持、肾衰竭和死亡率。
纳入了 8 项关于 942 例患者的数据的研究最终纳入了分析。Cor-knot 装置与微创心脏瓣膜手术中体外循环时间(平均差值 [MD],-11.74;95%置信区间 [CI],-14.54 至-8.93;P<.00001)和主动脉阻断时间(MD,-14.36;95%CI,-19.63 至-9.09;P<.00001)缩短相关。总体上,术后瓣膜反流(风险比 [RR],0.40;95%CI,0.26 至 0.62;P<.0001)和延长呼吸机支持(RR,0.29;95%CI,0.13 至 0.65;P=0.003)的发生率较低。术后心房颤动、射血分数、肾衰竭和死亡率无差异。
心脏瓣膜手术中使用 Cor-knot 装置可减少主动脉阻断和体外循环时间。此外,与手工打结方法相比,自动紧固件可降低延长呼吸机支持和瓣膜反流的发生率,而在其他术后结果和死亡率方面无差异。