Suppr超能文献

在开放主动脉瓣置换术中自动钛钉与手工打结的比较。

Comparison of Automated Titanium Fasteners to Hand-Tied Knots in Open Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Lee Candice Y, Johnson Carl A, Siordia Juan A, Lehoux Juan M, Knight Peter A

机构信息

From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY USA.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2018 Jan/Feb;13(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000467.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times are independent predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Reducing ischemic times with automated titanium fasteners may improve surgical outcomes. This study compared operative times and costs of titanium fasteners versus hand-tied knots for prosthesis securement in open aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

A randomized control trial was conducted during a 16-month period at a single university medical center. Patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were randomized to the titanium fastener (n = 37) or hand-tied groups (n = 36). Knotting, aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and total operating room times were recorded. Hospital charges were also calculated for these procedures.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, concomitant procedures, prosthetic valve size, and sutures were similar between groups. The titanium fastener group had significantly reduced knotting (7.4 vs. 13.0 minutes, P < 0.001), aortic cross-clamp (69 vs. 90 minutes, P < 0.05), cardiopulmonary bypass (86 vs. 114 minutes, P < 0.05), and total operating room times (234 vs. 266 minutes, P < 0.05). Intraoperative complications occurred more frequently in the hand-tied group compared with the titanium fastener group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher in the titanium fastener group (US $10,428 vs. US $9671, P = 0.01). Hospitalization costs did not differ significantly between the titanium fastener and hand-tied group (US $23,987 vs. US $21,068, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium fastener use was associated with shorter knotting, aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and operating room times and fewer intraoperative complications in open aortic valve replacement, without significantly increasing hospitalization cost.

摘要

目的

主动脉交叉钳夹时间和体外循环时间是术后发病率和死亡率的独立预测因素。使用自动钛制紧固件缩短缺血时间可能会改善手术效果。本研究比较了在开放性主动脉瓣置换术中使用钛制紧固件与手工打结固定人工瓣膜的手术时间和成本。

方法

在一所大学医学中心进行了为期16个月的随机对照试验。接受择期主动脉瓣置换术的患者被随机分为钛制紧固件组(n = 37)或手工打结组(n = 36)。记录打结、主动脉交叉钳夹、体外循环和总手术时间。还计算了这些手术的医院费用。

结果

两组之间的基线特征、同期手术、人工瓣膜尺寸和缝线相似。钛制紧固件组的打结时间(7.4分钟对13.0分钟,P < 0.001)、主动脉交叉钳夹时间(69分钟对90分钟,P < 0.05)、体外循环时间(86分钟对114分钟,P < 0.05)和总手术时间(234分钟对266分钟,P < 0.05)显著缩短。与钛制紧固件组相比,手工打结组术中并发症发生率更高。两组术后并发症相似。钛制紧固件组的手术室成本显著更高(10428美元对9671美元,P = 0.01)。钛制紧固件组和手工打结组的住院费用差异无统计学意义(23987美元对21068美元,P = 0.12)。

结论

在开放性主动脉瓣置换术中,使用钛制紧固件可缩短打结、主动脉交叉钳夹、体外循环和手术时间,并减少术中并发症,且不会显著增加住院费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验