Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Oslo Myeloma Center, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):142-154. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30680-X. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
Improved therapeutic options are needed for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Subcutaneous bortezomib has replaced intravenous bortezomib as it is associated with a more favourable toxicity profile. We investigated the activity and safety of three different dosing regimens of oral panobinostat in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone for this indication.
PANORAMA 3 is an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study being done at 71 sites (hospitals and medical centres) across 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (as per International Myeloma Working Group 2014 criteria), who had received one to four previous lines of therapy (including an immunomodulatory agent), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 20 mg twice weekly, or 10 mg three times weekly, plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone. All study drugs were administered in 21-day cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive response technology provider, and stratified by number of previous treatment lines and age. The primary endpoint was overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles (analysed in all randomly assigned patients by intention to treat). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. No statistical comparisons between groups were planned. This trial is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654990.
Between April 27, 2016, and Jan 17, 2019, 248 patients were randomly assigned (82 to panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 83 to panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and 83 to 10 mg panobinostat three times weekly). Median duration of follow-up across all treatment groups was 14·7 months (IQR 7·8-24·1). The overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles was 62·2% (95% CI 50·8-72·7; 51 of 82 patients) for the 20 mg three times weekly group, 65·1% (53·8-75·2; 54 of 83 patients) for the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 50·6% (39·4-61·8; 42 of 83 patients) for the 10 mg three times weekly group. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 71 (91%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 69 (83%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 60 (75%) of 80 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common (≥20% patients in any group) grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [42%] of 78, 26 [31%] of 83, and 19 [24%] of 83 patients) and neutropenia (18 [23%], 13 [16%], and six [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 42 (54%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 40 (48%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 35 (44%) of 83 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common serious adverse event (≥10% patients in any group) was pneumonia (nine [12%] of 78, ten [12%] of 83, and nine [11%] of 80 patients). There were 14 deaths during the study (five [6%] of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, three [4%] of 83 in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and six [8%] of 80 in the 10 mg three times weekly group); none of these deaths was deemed treatment related.
The safety profile of panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly was more favourable than in previous trials of this regimen with intravenous bortezomib, suggesting that subcutaneous bortezomib improves the tolerability of the panobinostat plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone regimen. The overall response rate was highest in the 20 mg three times weekly and 20 mg twice weekly groups, with 10 mg three times weekly best tolerated.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Secura Bio.
对于复发或复发且难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者,需要改进治疗方案。与静脉注射硼替佐米相比,皮下注射硼替佐米具有更有利的毒性特征,因此已替代其成为多发性骨髓瘤的治疗方案。我们研究了三种不同剂量的帕比司他联合皮下注射硼替佐米和口服地塞米松治疗该适应症的疗效和安全性。
PANORAMA 3 是一项开放标签、随机、2 期研究,在 21 个国家的 71 个地点(医院和医疗中心)进行。年龄在 18 岁及以上的复发或复发且难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(根据国际骨髓瘤工作组 2014 年标准),接受过 1 至 4 线治疗(包括免疫调节剂),东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为 2 或更低,按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至接受帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次;20mg,每日 2 次;或 10mg,每日 3 次,联合皮下注射硼替佐米和口服地塞米松。所有研究药物均在 21 天周期内使用。随机分配由交互式反应技术提供商完成,并按治疗线数和年龄分层。主要终点是最多 8 个治疗周期后的总缓解率(按意向治疗分析所有随机分配患者)。安全性分析包括接受至少一剂任何研究药物的所有患者。未计划对各组进行统计学比较。本试验正在进行中,并在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02654990。
2016 年 4 月 27 日至 2019 年 1 月 17 日,248 例患者被随机分配(帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组 82 例;帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组 83 例;帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组 83 例)。所有治疗组的中位随访时间为 14.7 个月(IQR 7.8-24.1)。最多 8 个治疗周期后的总缓解率为:帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组为 62.2%(51/82 例);帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组为 65.1%(54/83 例);帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组为 50.6%(42/83 例)。帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组有 71 例(91%)、帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组有 69 例(83%)和帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组有 60 例(75%)患者发生 3-4 级不良事件;最常见的(任何组发生率≥20%)3-4 级不良事件为血小板减少症(帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组 33 例[42%],帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组 26 例[31%],帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组 19 例[24%])和中性粒细胞减少症(帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组 18 例[23%],帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组 13 例[16%],帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组 6 例[8%])。帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组有 42 例(54%)、帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组有 40 例(48%)和帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组有 35 例(44%)发生严重不良事件;最常见的(任何组发生率≥10%)严重不良事件为肺炎(帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组 9 例[12%],帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组 10 例[12%],帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组 9 例[11%])。研究期间有 14 例死亡(帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次组 5 例[6%],帕比司他 20mg,每日 2 次组 3 例[4%],帕比司他 10mg,每日 3 次组 6 例[8%]);无死亡被认为与治疗相关。
帕比司他 20mg,每日 3 次方案的安全性比先前静脉注射硼替佐米的研究更有利,表明皮下注射硼替佐米可提高帕比司他联合硼替佐米和地塞米松方案的耐受性。20mg,每日 3 次和 20mg,每日 2 次组的总缓解率最高,10mg,每日 3 次组的耐受性最好。
诺华制药和 Secura Bio。